| 83a5d512 | 30-Nov-2018 |
Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com> |
SPM: Remove remaining SMC interfaces
Also, add a disclaimer to explain that the current implementation of SPM
is a prototype that is going to undergo a lot of rework.
Change-Id: I303c1e61c51d9f286c
SPM: Remove remaining SMC interfaces
Also, add a disclaimer to explain that the current implementation of SPM
is a prototype that is going to undergo a lot of rework.
Change-Id: I303c1e61c51d9f286cc599fea565fc9ba5a996bf
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| cdb6ac94 | 16-Feb-2018 |
Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com> |
SDEI: Make dispatches synchronous
SDEI event dispatches currently only sets up the Non-secure context
before returning to the caller. The actual dispatch only happens upon
exiting EL3 next time.
Ho
SDEI: Make dispatches synchronous
SDEI event dispatches currently only sets up the Non-secure context
before returning to the caller. The actual dispatch only happens upon
exiting EL3 next time.
However, for various error handling scenarios, it's beneficial to have
the dispatch happen synchronously. I.e. when receiving SDEI interrupt,
or for a successful sdei_dispatch_event() call, the event handler is
executed; and upon the event completion, dispatcher execution resumes
after the point of dispatch. The jump primitives introduced in the
earlier patch facilitates this feature.
With this patch:
- SDEI interrupts and calls to sdei_dispatch_event prepares the NS
context for event dispatch, then sets a jump point, and immediately
exits EL3. This results in the client handler executing in
Non-secure.
- When the SDEI client completes the dispatched event, the SDEI
dispatcher does a longjmp to the jump pointer created earlier. For
the caller of the sdei_dispatch_event() in particular, this would
appear as if call returned successfully.
The dynamic workaround for CVE_2018_3639 is slightly shifted around as
part of related minor refactoring. It doesn't affect the workaround
functionality.
Documentation updated.
NOTE: This breaks the semantics of the explicit dispatch API, and any
exiting usages should be carefully reviewed.
Change-Id: Ib9c876d27ea2af7fb22de49832e55a0da83da3f9
Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| d801a1d0 | 06-Jun-2018 |
Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com> |
SPM: Treat SP xlat tables the same as others
The translation tables allocated for the Secure Partition do not need
to be treated as a special case. They can be put amongst the other
tables mapping B
SPM: Treat SP xlat tables the same as others
The translation tables allocated for the Secure Partition do not need
to be treated as a special case. They can be put amongst the other
tables mapping BL31's general purpose memory. They will be mapped with
the same attributes as them, which is fine.
The explicit alignment constraint in BL31's linker script to pad the
last page of memory allocated to the Secure Partition's translation
tables is useless too, as page tables are per se pages, thus their
end address is naturally aligned on a page-boundary.
In fact, this patch does not change the existing behaviour. Since
patch 22282bb68a31 ("SPM: Move all SP-related info to SP context
struct"), the secure_partition.c file has been renamed into sp_xlat.c
but the linker script has not been properly updated. As a result, the
SP translation tables are not specifically put at the start of the
xlat_table linker section, the __SP_IMAGE_XLAT_TABLES_START__/_END__
symbols have the same value, the size of the resulting mmap_region
covering these xlat tables is 0 and so it is ignored.
Change-Id: I4cf0a4cc090298811cca53fc9cee74df0f2b1512
Signed-off-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com>
show more ...
|