| 14e09cc4 | 11-Apr-2019 |
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> |
sp_min: allow inclusion of a platform-specific linker script
Similar to bl31 allow sp_min to also include a platform-specific
linker script. This allows for example to place specific code in
other m
sp_min: allow inclusion of a platform-specific linker script
Similar to bl31 allow sp_min to also include a platform-specific
linker script. This allows for example to place specific code in
other memories of the system, like resume code in sram, while the
main tf-a lives in ddr.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Change-Id: I67642f7bfca036b5d51eb0fa092b479a647a9cc1
show more ...
|
| ad925094 | 10-May-2018 |
Roberto Vargas <roberto.vargas@arm.com> |
Add .extab and .exidx sections
These sections are required by clang when the code is compiled for
aarch32. These sections are related to the unwind of the stack in
exceptions, but in the way that cl
Add .extab and .exidx sections
These sections are required by clang when the code is compiled for
aarch32. These sections are related to the unwind of the stack in
exceptions, but in the way that clang defines and uses them, the
garbage collector cannot get rid of them.
Change-Id: I085efc0cf77eae961d522472f72c4b5bad2237ab
Signed-off-by: Roberto Vargas <roberto.vargas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| bb00ea5b | 27-Apr-2018 |
Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com> |
TSP: Enable cache along with MMU
Previously, data caches were disabled while enabling MMU only because of
active stack. Now that we can enable MMU without using stack, we can
enable both MMU and dat
TSP: Enable cache along with MMU
Previously, data caches were disabled while enabling MMU only because of
active stack. Now that we can enable MMU without using stack, we can
enable both MMU and data caches at the same time.
Change-Id: I73f3b8bae5178610e17e9ad06f81f8f6f97734a6
Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| 0a2d5b43 | 02-Feb-2018 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
types: use int-ll64 for both aarch32 and aarch64
Since commit 031dbb122472 ("AArch32: Add essential Arch helpers"),
it is difficult to use consistent format strings for printf() family
between aarch
types: use int-ll64 for both aarch32 and aarch64
Since commit 031dbb122472 ("AArch32: Add essential Arch helpers"),
it is difficult to use consistent format strings for printf() family
between aarch32 and aarch64.
For example, uint64_t is defined as 'unsigned long long' for aarch32
and as 'unsigned long' for aarch64. Likewise, uintptr_t is defined
as 'unsigned int' for aarch32, and as 'unsigned long' for aarch64.
A problem typically arises when you use printf() in common code.
One solution could be, to cast the arguments to a type long enough
for both architectures. For example, if 'val' is uint64_t type,
like this:
printf("val = %llx\n", (unsigned long long)val);
Or, somebody may suggest to use a macro provided by <inttypes.h>,
like this:
printf("val = %" PRIx64 "\n", val);
But, both would make the code ugly.
The solution adopted in Linux kernel is to use the same typedefs for
all architectures. The fixed integer types in the kernel-space have
been unified into int-ll64, like follows:
typedef signed char int8_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef signed short int16_t;
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
typedef signed int int32_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef signed long long int64_t;
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
[ Linux commit: 0c79a8e29b5fcbcbfd611daf9d500cfad8370fcf ]
This gets along with the codebase shared between 32 bit and 64 bit,
with the data model called ILP32, LP64, respectively.
The width for primitive types is defined as follows:
ILP32 LP64
int 32 32
long 32 64
long long 64 64
pointer 32 64
'long long' is 64 bit for both, so it is used for defining uint64_t.
'long' has the same width as pointer, so for uintptr_t.
We still need an ifdef conditional for (s)size_t.
All 64 bit architectures use "unsigned long" size_t, and most 32 bit
architectures use "unsigned int" size_t. H8/300, S/390 are known as
exceptions; they use "unsigned long" size_t despite their architecture
is 32 bit.
One idea for simplification might be to define size_t as 'unsigned long'
across architectures, then forbid the use of "%z" string format.
However, this would cause a distortion between size_t and sizeof()
operator. We have unknowledge about the native type of sizeof(), so
we need a guess of it anyway. I want the following formula to always
return 1:
__builtin_types_compatible_p(size_t, typeof(sizeof(int)))
Fortunately, ARM is probably a majority case. As far as I know, all
32 bit ARM compilers use "unsigned int" size_t.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
show more ...
|