| 0a2d5b43 | 02-Feb-2018 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
types: use int-ll64 for both aarch32 and aarch64
Since commit 031dbb122472 ("AArch32: Add essential Arch helpers"),
it is difficult to use consistent format strings for printf() family
between aarch
types: use int-ll64 for both aarch32 and aarch64
Since commit 031dbb122472 ("AArch32: Add essential Arch helpers"),
it is difficult to use consistent format strings for printf() family
between aarch32 and aarch64.
For example, uint64_t is defined as 'unsigned long long' for aarch32
and as 'unsigned long' for aarch64. Likewise, uintptr_t is defined
as 'unsigned int' for aarch32, and as 'unsigned long' for aarch64.
A problem typically arises when you use printf() in common code.
One solution could be, to cast the arguments to a type long enough
for both architectures. For example, if 'val' is uint64_t type,
like this:
printf("val = %llx\n", (unsigned long long)val);
Or, somebody may suggest to use a macro provided by <inttypes.h>,
like this:
printf("val = %" PRIx64 "\n", val);
But, both would make the code ugly.
The solution adopted in Linux kernel is to use the same typedefs for
all architectures. The fixed integer types in the kernel-space have
been unified into int-ll64, like follows:
typedef signed char int8_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef signed short int16_t;
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
typedef signed int int32_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef signed long long int64_t;
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
[ Linux commit: 0c79a8e29b5fcbcbfd611daf9d500cfad8370fcf ]
This gets along with the codebase shared between 32 bit and 64 bit,
with the data model called ILP32, LP64, respectively.
The width for primitive types is defined as follows:
ILP32 LP64
int 32 32
long 32 64
long long 64 64
pointer 32 64
'long long' is 64 bit for both, so it is used for defining uint64_t.
'long' has the same width as pointer, so for uintptr_t.
We still need an ifdef conditional for (s)size_t.
All 64 bit architectures use "unsigned long" size_t, and most 32 bit
architectures use "unsigned int" size_t. H8/300, S/390 are known as
exceptions; they use "unsigned long" size_t despite their architecture
is 32 bit.
One idea for simplification might be to define size_t as 'unsigned long'
across architectures, then forbid the use of "%z" string format.
However, this would cause a distortion between size_t and sizeof()
operator. We have unknowledge about the native type of sizeof(), so
we need a guess of it anyway. I want the following formula to always
return 1:
__builtin_types_compatible_p(size_t, typeof(sizeof(int)))
Fortunately, ARM is probably a majority case. As far as I know, all
32 bit ARM compilers use "unsigned int" size_t.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
show more ...
|
| 01c0a38e | 26-Apr-2018 |
Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com> |
xlat: Set AP[1] to 1 when it is RES1
According to the ARMv8 ARM issue C.a:
AP[1] is valid only for stage 1 of a translation regime that can
support two VA ranges. It is RES 1 when stage 1 t
xlat: Set AP[1] to 1 when it is RES1
According to the ARMv8 ARM issue C.a:
AP[1] is valid only for stage 1 of a translation regime that can
support two VA ranges. It is RES 1 when stage 1 translations can
support only one VA range.
This means that, even though this bit is ignored, it should be set to 1
in the EL3 and EL2 translation regimes.
For translation regimes consisting on EL0 and a higher regime this bit
selects between control at EL0 or at the higher Exception level. The
regimes that support two VA ranges are EL1&0 and EL2&0 (the later one
is only available since ARMv8.1).
This fix has to be applied to both versions of the translation tables
library.
Change-Id: If19aaf588551bac7aeb6e9a686cf0c2068e7c181
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| 2f370465 | 23-Apr-2018 |
Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com> |
Add support for the SMC Calling Convention 2.0
Due to differences in the bitfields of the SMC IDs, it is not possible
to support SMCCC 1.X and 2.0 at the same time.
The behaviour of `SMCCC_MAJOR_VE
Add support for the SMC Calling Convention 2.0
Due to differences in the bitfields of the SMC IDs, it is not possible
to support SMCCC 1.X and 2.0 at the same time.
The behaviour of `SMCCC_MAJOR_VERSION` has changed. Now, it is a build
option that specifies the major version of the SMCCC that the Trusted
Firmware supports. The only two allowed values are 1 and 2, and it
defaults to 1. The value of `SMCCC_MINOR_VERSION` is derived from it.
Note: Support for SMCCC v2.0 is an experimental feature to enable
prototyping of secure partition specifications. Support for this
convention is disabled by default and could be removed without notice.
Change-Id: I88abf9ccf08e9c66a13ce55c890edea54d9f16a7
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| a205a56e | 12-Mar-2018 |
Dimitris Papastamos <dimitris.papastamos@arm.com> |
Fixup `SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES` semantics
When querying `SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1` through `SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES`,
return either:
* -1 to indicate the PE on which `SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES` is called
req
Fixup `SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES` semantics
When querying `SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1` through `SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES`,
return either:
* -1 to indicate the PE on which `SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES` is called
requires firmware mitigation for CVE-2017-5715 but the mitigation
is not compiled in.
* 0 to indicate that firmware mitigation is required, or
* 1 to indicate that no firmware mitigation is required.
This patch complies with v1.2 of the firmware interfaces
specification (ARM DEN 0070A).
Change-Id: Ibc32d6620efdac6c340758ec502d95554a55f02a
Signed-off-by: Dimitris Papastamos <dimitris.papastamos@arm.com>
show more ...
|