| /rk3399_ARM-atf/plat/nvidia/tegra/scat/ |
| H A D | bl31.scat | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/plat/socionext/synquacer/ |
| H A D | sq_bl31_setup.c | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| H A D | platform.mk | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/services/std_svc/ |
| H A D | std_svc_setup.c | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/plat/arm/board/fvp/ |
| H A D | fvp_common.c | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| H A D | platform.mk | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/bl31/ |
| H A D | bl31.ld.S | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| H A D | bl31.mk | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/include/plat/arm/common/ |
| H A D | arm_def.h | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| H A D | plat_arm.h | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/plat/arm/board/fvp/include/ |
| H A D | platform_def.h | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/plat/arm/common/ |
| H A D | arm_common.mk | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/make_helpers/ |
| H A D | defaults.mk | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/docs/getting_started/ |
| H A D | build-options.rst | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/ |
| H A D | Makefile | 3f3c341ae58321ec1b86162916d80b6db9187759 Mon Sep 16 11:29:03 UTC 2019 Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com> Remove dependency between SPM_MM and ENABLE_SPM build flags
There are two different implementations of Secure Partition
management in TF-A. One is based on the "Management Mode" (MM)
design, the other is based on the Secure Partition Client Interface
(SPCI) specification. Currently there is a dependency between their
build flags that shouldn't exist, making further development
harder than it should be. This patch removes that
dependency, making the two flags function independently.
Before: ENABLE_SPM=1 is required for using either implementation.
By default, the SPCI-based implementation is enabled and
this is overridden if SPM_MM=1.
After: ENABLE_SPM=1 enables the SPCI-based implementation.
SPM_MM=1 enables the MM-based implementation.
The two build flags are mutually exclusive.
Note that the name of the ENABLE_SPM flag remains a bit
ambiguous - this will be improved in a subsequent patch. For this
patch the intention was to leave the name as-is so that it is
easier to track the changes that were made.
Change-Id: I8e64ee545d811c7000f27e8dc8ebb977d670608a
Signed-off-by: Paul Beesley <paul.beesley@arm.com>
|