xref: /OK3568_Linux_fs/buildroot/package/ecryptfs-utils/0003-fix-parallel-build-issue.patch (revision 4882a59341e53eb6f0b4789bf948001014eff981)
1fix parallel build issue
2
3Build randomly fails since December 2017 on buildroot
4(http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=ecryptfs-utils-111):
5
6make[5]: Entering directory '/home/buildroot/autobuild/instance-2/output-1/build/ecryptfs-utils-111/src/utils'
7  /bin/mkdir -p '/home/buildroot/autobuild/instance-2/output-1/target/sbin'
8  /bin/bash ../../libtool   --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c mount.ecryptfs umount.ecryptfs mount.ecryptfs_private '/home/buildroot/autobuild/instance-2/output-1/target/sbin'
9libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c mount.ecryptfs /home/buildroot/autobuild/instance-2/output-1/target/sbin/mount.ecryptfs
10/usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file '/home/buildroot/autobuild/instance-2/output-1/target/sbin/mount.ecryptfs': File exists
11Makefile:832: recipe for target 'install-rootsbinPROGRAMS' failed
12make[5]: *** [install-rootsbinPROGRAMS] Error 1
13
14As spotted by Thomas Petazzoni, build failure happens because of the
15following line in src/utils/Makefile.am:
16
17install-exec-hook:      install-rootsbinPROGRAMS
18        -rm -f "$(DESTDIR)/$(rootsbindir)/umount.ecryptfs_private"
19        $(LN_S) "mount.ecryptfs_private" "$(DESTDIR)/$(rootsbindir)/umount.ecryptfs_private"
20
21The install-exec-hook target should not have a dependency on
22install-rootsbinPROGRAMS.
23
24From https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Extending.html#Extending:
25
26"""
27In contrast, some rules also have a way to run another rule, called a
28hook; hooks are always executed after the main rule’s work is done. The
29hook is named after the principal target, with ‘-hook’ appended. The
30targets allowing hooks are install-data, install-exec, uninstall, dist,
31and distcheck.
32
33For instance, here is how to create a hard link to an installed program:
34
35install-exec-hook:
36        ln $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/program$(EXEEXT) \
37           $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/proglink$(EXEEXT)
38
39"""
40
41So, they explicitly say that these hooks are run after the main rule
42work is done, which means the dependency on install-rootsbinPROGRAMS is
43not needed. And the example they use to illustrate is *exactly* the
44situation of ecryptfs-utils: creating a link to a program that was
45installed.
46
47Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
48[Upstream status: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1857622]
49
50diff -Nuar ecryptfs-utils-111-orig/src/utils/Makefile.in ecryptfs-utils-111/src/utils/Makefile.in
51--- ecryptfs-utils-111-orig/src/utils/Makefile.in	2019-12-26 15:14:16.656146065 +0100
52+++ ecryptfs-utils-111/src/utils/Makefile.in	2019-12-26 17:36:07.108496164 +0100
53@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@
54 .PRECIOUS: Makefile
55
56
57-install-exec-hook:	install-rootsbinPROGRAMS
58+install-exec-hook:
59 	-rm -f "$(DESTDIR)/$(rootsbindir)/umount.ecryptfs_private"
60 	$(LN_S) "mount.ecryptfs_private" "$(DESTDIR)/$(rootsbindir)/umount.ecryptfs_private"
61
62