Searched hist:deb8508c518b8e49f2cd3199861e639d9eeebd9f (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /rk3399_rockchip-uboot/drivers/usb/host/ |
| H A D | ehci-faraday.c | deb8508c518b8e49f2cd3199861e639d9eeebd9f Wed Mar 25 18:22:27 UTC 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> dm: usb: Drop the EHCI weak functions
These are a pain with driver model because we might have different EHCI
drivers which want to implement them differently. Now that they use
consistent function signatures, we can in good conscience move them to
a struct.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Fix non-driver-model EHCI to set up the EHCI operations correctly:
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| H A D | ehci-mx5.c | deb8508c518b8e49f2cd3199861e639d9eeebd9f Wed Mar 25 18:22:27 UTC 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> dm: usb: Drop the EHCI weak functions
These are a pain with driver model because we might have different EHCI
drivers which want to implement them differently. Now that they use
consistent function signatures, we can in good conscience move them to
a struct.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Fix non-driver-model EHCI to set up the EHCI operations correctly:
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| H A D | ehci.h | deb8508c518b8e49f2cd3199861e639d9eeebd9f Wed Mar 25 18:22:27 UTC 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> dm: usb: Drop the EHCI weak functions
These are a pain with driver model because we might have different EHCI
drivers which want to implement them differently. Now that they use
consistent function signatures, we can in good conscience move them to
a struct.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Fix non-driver-model EHCI to set up the EHCI operations correctly:
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| H A D | ehci-tegra.c | deb8508c518b8e49f2cd3199861e639d9eeebd9f Wed Mar 25 18:22:27 UTC 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> dm: usb: Drop the EHCI weak functions
These are a pain with driver model because we might have different EHCI
drivers which want to implement them differently. Now that they use
consistent function signatures, we can in good conscience move them to
a struct.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Fix non-driver-model EHCI to set up the EHCI operations correctly:
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| H A D | ehci-hcd.c | deb8508c518b8e49f2cd3199861e639d9eeebd9f Wed Mar 25 18:22:27 UTC 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> dm: usb: Drop the EHCI weak functions
These are a pain with driver model because we might have different EHCI
drivers which want to implement them differently. Now that they use
consistent function signatures, we can in good conscience move them to
a struct.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Fix non-driver-model EHCI to set up the EHCI operations correctly:
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|