Searched hist:"9 fbb0c3aa49f4604b0342cb527a6bd099f92eaeb" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /rk3399_rockchip-uboot/board/sunxi/ |
| H A D | ahci.c | 9fbb0c3aa49f4604b0342cb527a6bd099f92eaeb Tue Mar 22 19:10:30 UTC 2016 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> sunxi: Turn satapwr on from board_init
There are 2 reasons for doing this:
1) The main reason for doing this is to move it outside of
board/sunxi/ahci.c, so that it can be used on boards which use
a usb<->sata chip too;
2) While doing this I realized that doing it from board_init also meant
doing it much earlier. Some printf get_timer(0) calls show that the
time between board_init() and scsi_init() is more then 600 ms,
so we can drop the mdelay(500)
While at it also drop the printf("SUNXI SCSI INIT\n") AHCI init is
noisy enough by itself.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|
| H A D | board.c | 9fbb0c3aa49f4604b0342cb527a6bd099f92eaeb Tue Mar 22 19:10:30 UTC 2016 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> sunxi: Turn satapwr on from board_init
There are 2 reasons for doing this:
1) The main reason for doing this is to move it outside of
board/sunxi/ahci.c, so that it can be used on boards which use
a usb<->sata chip too;
2) While doing this I realized that doing it from board_init also meant
doing it much earlier. Some printf get_timer(0) calls show that the
time between board_init() and scsi_init() is more then 600 ms,
so we can drop the mdelay(500)
While at it also drop the printf("SUNXI SCSI INIT\n") AHCI init is
noisy enough by itself.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|