| /optee_os/core/include/kernel/ |
| H A D | user_mode_ctx_struct.h | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | user_mode_ctx.h | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|
| /optee_os/core/arch/arm/include/kernel/ |
| H A D | secure_partition.h | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|
| /optee_os/core/arch/arm/kernel/ |
| H A D | secure_partition.c | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|
| /optee_os/core/tee/ |
| H A D | tee_svc.c | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|
| /optee_os/core/arch/arm/mm/ |
| H A D | tee_pager.c | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | core_mmu.c | 1f648d5427e836938a2dbaaf20fe0b4769a71f20 Fri Oct 09 08:18:24 UTC 2020 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> core: remove struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx
Removes struct tee_ta_ctx from struct user_mode_ctx allowing a user mode
entity to be independent of the TA concept, that is, making room for SPs
in user mode.
A pointer to a struct user_mode_ctx is passed to many memory management
functions where a pointer to a struct ts_ctx is needed too. Prior to
this patch it was possible to calculate that address of corresponding
struct ts_ctx with help of the container_of() macro, that is no longer
possible. Instead is a struct ts_ctx *ts_ctx field added to struct
user_mode_ctx in order to allow such lookups.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
|