| d5f3d17c | 23-Mar-2015 |
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
armv8: semihosting: delete external interface
Now that loading files using semihosting can be done using
a command in standard scripts, and we have rewritten the boardfile
and added it to the Vexpre
armv8: semihosting: delete external interface
Now that loading files using semihosting can be done using
a command in standard scripts, and we have rewritten the boardfile
and added it to the Vexpress64, let's delete the external
interface to the semihosting file retrieveal and rely solely
on these commands, and staticize them inside that file so the
whole business is self-contained.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
| 202a674b | 23-Mar-2015 |
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
armv8: semihosting: add a command to load semihosted images
Instead of sprinkling custom code and calls over the Vexpress64
boardfile, create a command that loads images using semihosting
just like
armv8: semihosting: add a command to load semihosted images
Instead of sprinkling custom code and calls over the Vexpress64
boardfile, create a command that loads images using semihosting
just like we would load from flash memory of over the network,
using a special command:
smhload <image> <address>
This will make it possible to remove some custom calls and
code and make the boot easier.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
| dd09f7e7 | 06-Mar-2015 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
ARM: PSCI: Rework the DT handler slightly
The way the PSCI DT update happens currently means we pull in
<asm/armv7.h> everywhere, including on ARMv8 and that in turn brings in
<asm/io.h> for some no
ARM: PSCI: Rework the DT handler slightly
The way the PSCI DT update happens currently means we pull in
<asm/armv7.h> everywhere, including on ARMv8 and that in turn brings in
<asm/io.h> for some non-PSCI related things that header needs to deal
with.
To fix this, we rework the hook slightly. A good portion of
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c is common looking and I hope that when PSCI
is needed on ARMv8 we can re-use this by and large. So rename the
current hook to psci_update_dt(), move the prototype to <asm/psci.h> and
add an #ifdef that will make re-use later easier.
Reported-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
show more ...
|
| db910353 | 03-Mar-2015 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
arm: spl: Allow board_init_r() to run with a larger stack
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment
arm: spl: Allow board_init_r() to run with a larger stack
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, before board_init_f(),
so that the larger stack can be used.
This is an abuse of lowlevel_init(). That function should only be used for
essential start-up code which cannot be delayed. An example of a valid use is
when only part of the SPL code is visible/executable, and the SoC must be set
up so that board_init_f() can be reached. It should not be used for SDRAM
init, console init, etc.
Add a CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R option, which allows the stack to be moved to a new
address before board_init_r() is called in SPL.
The expected SPL flow (for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK) is documented in the README.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For version 1:
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
| 9be5c661 | 15-Dec-2014 |
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
arm: semihosting: get rid of forward declarations
By rearranging the functions in the semihosting code we can
avoid forward-declaration of the internal static functions.
This puts the stuff in a log
arm: semihosting: get rid of forward declarations
By rearranging the functions in the semihosting code we can
avoid forward-declaration of the internal static functions.
This puts the stuff in a logical order: read/open/close/len
and then higher-order functions follow at the end.
Cc: Darwin Rambo <drambo@broadcom.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Hambleton <mark.hambleton@arm.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Acked-by: Steve Rae <srae@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
show more ...
|