Merge changes from topic "bk/pabandon_cleanup" into integration

* changes:
feat(cpus): add pabandon support to the Alto cpu
feat(psci): optimise clock init on a pabandon
feat(psci): check that

Merge changes from topic "bk/pabandon_cleanup" into integration

* changes:
feat(cpus): add pabandon support to the Alto cpu
feat(psci): optimise clock init on a pabandon
feat(psci): check that CPUs handled a pabandon
feat(psci): make pabandon support generic
refactor(psci): unify coherency exit between AArch64 and AArch32
refactor(psci): absorb psci_power_down_wfi() into common code
refactor(platforms): remove usage of psci_power_down_wfi
fix(cm): disable SPE/TRBE correctly

show more ...

refactor(platforms): remove usage of psci_power_down_wfi

The callers in PSCI will now call wfi() after calling the
pwr_domain_pwr_down() platform hook (previously they were mutually
exclusive). As s

refactor(platforms): remove usage of psci_power_down_wfi

The callers in PSCI will now call wfi() after calling the
pwr_domain_pwr_down() platform hook (previously they were mutually
exclusive). As such, there is no need for platforms to do this
themselves. In fact, it is strongly advisable for platforms not to do
this themselves so that the PSCI can apply any relevant errata
mitigations.

Change-Id: Ic9702edef7503996be24d984e29dfcc13bc3fcba
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration

* changes:
fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset
chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_

Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration

* changes:
fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset
chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi`
chore(psci): drop skip_wfi variable
feat(arm): convert arm platforms to expect a wakeup
fix(cpus): avoid SME related loss of context on powerdown
feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown
refactor: panic after calling psci_power_down_wfi()
refactor(cpus): undo errata mitigations
feat(cpus): add sysreg_bit_toggle

show more ...

refactor: panic after calling psci_power_down_wfi()

This function doesn't return and its callers that don't return either
rely on this. Drop the dead attribute and add a panic() after it to make
thi

refactor: panic after calling psci_power_down_wfi()

This function doesn't return and its callers that don't return either
rely on this. Drop the dead attribute and add a panic() after it to make
this expectation explicit. Calling `wfi` in the powerdown sequence is
terminal so even if the function was made to return, there would be no
functional change.

This is useful for a following patch that makes psci_power_down_wfi()
return.

Change-Id: I62ca1ee058b1eaeb046966c795081e01bf45a2eb
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes from topic "sunxi-split-psci" into integration

* changes:
allwinner: Split native and SCPI-based PSCI implementations
allwinner: psci: Improve system shutdown/reset sequence
allw

Merge changes from topic "sunxi-split-psci" into integration

* changes:
allwinner: Split native and SCPI-based PSCI implementations
allwinner: psci: Improve system shutdown/reset sequence
allwinner: psci: Drop .pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi callback
allwinner: Separate code to power off self and other CPUs

show more ...

allwinner: Split native and SCPI-based PSCI implementations

In order to keep SCP firmware as optional, the original, limited native
PSCI implementation was kept around as a fallback. This turned out

allwinner: Split native and SCPI-based PSCI implementations

In order to keep SCP firmware as optional, the original, limited native
PSCI implementation was kept around as a fallback. This turned out to be
a good decision, as some newer SoCs omit the ARISC, and thus cannot run
SCP firmware.

However, keeping the two implementations in one file makes things
unnecessarily messy. First, it is difficult to compile out the
SCPI-based implementation where it is not applicable. Second the check
is done in each callback, while scpi_available is only updated at boot.
This makes the individual callbacks unnecessarily complicated.

It is cleaner to provide two entirely separate implementations in two
separate files. The native implementation does not support any kind of
CPU suspend, so its callbacks are greatly simplified. One function,
sunxi_validate_ns_entrypoint, is shared between the two implementations.

Finally, the logic for choosing between implementations is kept in a
third file, to provide for platforms where only one implementation is
applicable and the other is compiled out.

Change-Id: I4914f07d8e693dbce218e0e2394bef15c42945f8
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>

show more ...