Merge changes I86959e67,I0b0d1d36,I5b5267f4,I056c8710,I3474aa97 into integration

* changes:
chore: fix preprocessor checks
refactor: convert arm platforms to use the generic GIC driver
refacto

Merge changes I86959e67,I0b0d1d36,I5b5267f4,I056c8710,I3474aa97 into integration

* changes:
chore: fix preprocessor checks
refactor: convert arm platforms to use the generic GIC driver
refactor(gic): promote most of the GIC driver to common code
refactor: make arm_gicv2.c and arm_gicv3.c common
refactor(fvp): use more arm generic code for gicv3

show more ...

refactor(gic): promote most of the GIC driver to common code

More often than not, Arm based systems include some revision of a GIC.
There are two ways of adding support for them in platform code - c

refactor(gic): promote most of the GIC driver to common code

More often than not, Arm based systems include some revision of a GIC.
There are two ways of adding support for them in platform code - calling
the top-level helpers from plat/arm/common/arm_gicvX.c or by using the
driver directly. Both of these methods allow for a high degree of
customisation - most functions are defined to be weak and there are no
calls to any of them in generic code.

As it turns out, requirements around those GICs are largely the same.
Platforms that use arm_gicvX.c use the helpers identically among each
other. Platforms that use the driver directly tend to end up with calls
that look a lot like the arm_gicvX.c helpers and the weakness of the
functions are never exercised.

All of this results in a lot of code duplication to do what is
essentially the same thing. Even though it's not a lot of code, when
multiplied among many platforms it becomes significant and makes
refactoring it quite difficult. It's also bug prone since the steps are
a little convoluted and things are likely to work even with subtle
errors (see 50009f61177421118f42d6a000611ba0e613d54b).

So promote as much of the GIC to be called from common code. Do the
setup in bl31_main() and have every PSCI method do the state management
directly instead of delegating it to the platform hooks. We can base
this implementation on arm_gicvX.c since they already offer logical
names and have worked quite well so far with minimal changes.

The main benefit of doing this is reduced code duplication. If we assume
that, outside of some platform setup, GIC management is identical, then
a platform can add support by telling the build system, regardless of
GIC revision. The other benefit is performance - BL31 and PSCI already
know the core_pos and they can pass it as an argument instead of having
to call plat_my_core_pos(). Now, the only platform specific GIC actions
necessary are the saving and restoring of context on entering and
exiting a power domain. The PSCI library does not keep track of this so
it is unable perform it itself. The routines themselves are also
provided.

For compatibility all of this is hidden behind a build flag. Platforms
are encouraged to adopt this driver, but it would not be practical to
convert and validate every GIC based platform.

This patch renames the functions in question to follow the
gic_<function>() convention. This allows the names to be version
agnostic.

Finally, drop the weak definitions - they are unused, likely to remain
so, and can be added back if the need arises.

Change-Id: I5b5267f4b72f633fb1096400ec8e4b208694135f
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes from topic "sm/rpkm" into integration

* changes:
docs(rmmd): document the EL3-RMM IDE KM Interface
feat(trp): test el3-rmm ide km interface
feat(rmmd): el3-rmm ide key management

Merge changes from topic "sm/rpkm" into integration

* changes:
docs(rmmd): document the EL3-RMM IDE KM Interface
feat(trp): test el3-rmm ide km interface
feat(rmmd): el3-rmm ide key management interface

show more ...

feat(rmmd): el3-rmm ide key management interface

Patch introduces the EL3-RMM SMC Interface for Root Port
Key management as per RFC discussed here:
https://github.com/TF-RMM/tf-rmm/wiki/RFC:-EL3-RMM

feat(rmmd): el3-rmm ide key management interface

Patch introduces the EL3-RMM SMC Interface for Root Port
Key management as per RFC discussed here:
https://github.com/TF-RMM/tf-rmm/wiki/RFC:-EL3-RMM-IDE-KM-Interface

Three IDE Key management smc calls have been added:
- RMM_IDE_KEY_PROG()
- RMM_IDE_KEY_SET_GO()
- RMM_IDE_KEY_SET_STOP()
- RMM_IDE_KM_PULL_RESPONSE()

Due to the absence of root port support in FVP, we are
currently adding placeholders in this patch for the platform
APIs to return success irrespective of the arguments being passed
by the caller(Realms). The SMCs are guarded by
`RMMD_ENABLE_IDE_KEY_PROG` build flag and is disabled by default.
We expect that once the SMCs are stabilized, this build flag will
not be required anymore.

Change-Id: I9411eb7787dac2a207bd14710d251503bd9626ce
Signed-off-by: Sona Mathew <sonarebecca.mathew@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes from topic "dtpm_poc" into integration

* changes:
feat(docs): update mboot threat model with dTPM
docs(tpm): add design documentation for dTPM
fix(rpi3): expose BL1_RW to BL2 ma

Merge changes from topic "dtpm_poc" into integration

* changes:
feat(docs): update mboot threat model with dTPM
docs(tpm): add design documentation for dTPM
fix(rpi3): expose BL1_RW to BL2 map for mboot
feat(rpi3): add dTPM backed measured boot
feat(tpm): add Infineon SLB9670 GPIO SPI config
feat(tpm): add tpm drivers and framework
feat(io): add generic gpio spi bit-bang driver
feat(rpi3): implement eventlog handoff to BL33
feat(rpi3): implement mboot for rpi3

show more ...

feat(tpm): add tpm drivers and framework

Add tpm2 drivers to tf-a with adequate framework
-implement a fifo spi interface that works
with discrete tpm chip.
-implement tpm command layer interfaces

feat(tpm): add tpm drivers and framework

Add tpm2 drivers to tf-a with adequate framework
-implement a fifo spi interface that works
with discrete tpm chip.
-implement tpm command layer interfaces that are used
to initialize, start and make measurements and
close the interface.
-tpm drivers are built using their own make file
to allow for ease in porting across platforms,
and across different interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Khandelwal <tushar.khandelwal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhi Singh <abhi.singh@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ie1a189f45c80f26f4dea16c3bd71b1503709e0ea

show more ...

Merge changes I3d950e72,Id315a8fe,Ib62e6e9b,I1d0475b2 into integration

* changes:
perf(cm): drop ZCR_EL3 saving and some ISBs and replace them with root context
perf(psci): get PMF timestamps wi

Merge changes I3d950e72,Id315a8fe,Ib62e6e9b,I1d0475b2 into integration

* changes:
perf(cm): drop ZCR_EL3 saving and some ISBs and replace them with root context
perf(psci): get PMF timestamps with no cache flushes if possible
perf(amu): greatly simplify AMU context management
perf(mpmm): greatly simplify MPMM enablement

show more ...

perf(mpmm): greatly simplify MPMM enablement

MPMM is a core-specific microarchitectural feature. It has been present
in every Arm core since the Cortex-A510 and has been implemented in
exactly the s

perf(mpmm): greatly simplify MPMM enablement

MPMM is a core-specific microarchitectural feature. It has been present
in every Arm core since the Cortex-A510 and has been implemented in
exactly the same way. Despite that, it is enabled more like an
architectural feature with a top level enable flag. This utilised the
identical implementation.

This duality has left MPMM in an awkward place, where its enablement
should be generic, like an architectural feature, but since it is not,
it should also be core-specific if it ever changes. One choice to do
this has been through the device tree.

This has worked just fine so far, however, recent implementations expose
a weakness in that this is rather slow - the device tree has to be read,
there's a long call stack of functions with many branches, and system
registers are read. In the hot path of PSCI CPU powerdown, this has a
significant and measurable impact. Besides it being a rather large
amount of code that is difficult to understand.

Since MPMM is a microarchitectural feature, its correct placement is in
the reset function. The essence of the current enablement is to write
CPUPPMCR_EL3.MPMM_EN if CPUPPMCR_EL3.MPMMPINCTL == 0. Replacing the C
enablement with an assembly macro in each CPU's reset function achieves
the same effect with just a single close branch and a grand total of 6
instructions (versus the old 2 branches and 32 instructions).

Having done this, the device tree entry becomes redundant. Should a core
that doesn't support MPMM arise, this can cleanly be handled in the
reset function. As such, the whole ENABLE_MPMM_FCONF and platform hooks
mechanisms become obsolete and are removed.

Change-Id: I1d0475b21a1625bb3519f513ba109284f973ffdf
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration

* changes:
fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset
chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_

Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration

* changes:
fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset
chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi`
chore(psci): drop skip_wfi variable
feat(arm): convert arm platforms to expect a wakeup
fix(cpus): avoid SME related loss of context on powerdown
feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown
refactor: panic after calling psci_power_down_wfi()
refactor(cpus): undo errata mitigations
feat(cpus): add sysreg_bit_toggle

show more ...

Merge "feat(cpus): add ENABLE_ERRATA_ALL flag" into integration

feat(cpus): add ENABLE_ERRATA_ALL flag

Now that all errata flags are all conveniently in a single list we can
make sweeping decisions about their values. The first use-case is to
enable all errata i

feat(cpus): add ENABLE_ERRATA_ALL flag

Now that all errata flags are all conveniently in a single list we can
make sweeping decisions about their values. The first use-case is to
enable all errata in TF-A. This is useful for CI runs where it is
impractical to list every single one. This should help with the long
standing issue of errata not being built or tested.

Also add missing CPUs with errata to `ENABLE_ERRATA_ALL` to enable all
errata builds in CI.

Signed-off-by: Govindraj Raja <govindraj.raja@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
Change-Id: I2b456d304d7bf3215c7c4f4fd70b56ecbcb09979

show more ...

fix(cpus): avoid SME related loss of context on powerdown

Travis' and Gelas' TRMs tell us to disable SME (set PSTATE.{ZA, SM} to
0) when we're attempting to power down. What they don't tell us is th

fix(cpus): avoid SME related loss of context on powerdown

Travis' and Gelas' TRMs tell us to disable SME (set PSTATE.{ZA, SM} to
0) when we're attempting to power down. What they don't tell us is that
if this isn't done, the powerdown request will be rejected. On the
CPU_OFF path that's not a problem - we can force SVCR to 0 and be
certain the core will power off.

On the suspend to powerdown path, however, we cannot do this. The TRM
also tells us that the sequence could also be aborted on eg. GIC
interrupts. If this were to happen when we have overwritten SVCR to 0,
upon a return to the caller they would experience a loss of context. We
know that at least Linux may call into PSCI with SVCR != 0. One option
is to save the entire SME context which would be quite expensive just to
work around. Another option is to downgrade the request to a normal
suspend when SME was left on. This option is better as this is expected
to happen rarely enough to ignore the wasted power and we don't want to
burden the generic (correct) path with needless context management.

Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
Change-Id: I698fa8490ebf51461f6aa8bba84f9827c5c46ad4

show more ...

feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown

The simplistic view of a core's powerdown sequence is that power is
atomically cut upon calling `wfi`. However, it turns out that it has
lots to do

feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown

The simplistic view of a core's powerdown sequence is that power is
atomically cut upon calling `wfi`. However, it turns out that it has
lots to do - it has to talk to the interconnect to exit coherency, clean
caches, check for RAS errors, etc. These take significant amounts of
time and are certainly not atomic. As such there is a significant window
of opportunity for external events to happen. Many of these steps are
not destructive to context, so theoretically, the core can just "give
up" half way (or roll certain actions back) and carry on running. The
point in this sequence after which roll back is not possible is called
the point of no return.

One of these actions is the checking for RAS errors. It is possible for
one to happen during this lengthy sequence, or at least remain
undiscovered until that point. If the core were to continue powerdown
when that happens, there would be no (easy) way to inform anyone about
it. Rejecting the powerdown and letting software handle the error is the
best way to implement this.

Arm cores since at least the a510 have included this exact feature. So
far it hasn't been deemed necessary to account for it in firmware due to
the low likelihood of this happening. However, events like GIC wakeup
requests are much more probable. Older cores will powerdown and
immediately power back up when this happens. Travis and Gelas include a
feature similar to the RAS case above, called powerdown abandon. The
idea is that this will improve the latency to service the interrupt by
saving on work which the core and software need to do.

So far firmware has relied on the `wfi` being the point of no return and
if it doesn't explicitly detect a pending interrupt quite early on, it
will embark onto a sequence that it expects to end with shutdown. To
accommodate for it not being a point of no return, we must undo all of
the system management we did, just like in the warm boot entrypoint.

To achieve that, the pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi hook must not be terminal.
Most recent platforms do some platform management and finish on the
standard `wfi`, followed by a panic or an endless loop as this is
expected to not return. To make this generic, any platform that wishes
to support wakeups must instead let common code call
`psci_power_down_wfi()` right after. Besides wakeups, this lets common
code handle powerdown errata better as well.

Then, the CPU_OFF case is simple - PSCI does not allow it to return. So
the best that can be done is to attempt the `wfi` a few times (the
choice of 32 is arbitrary) in the hope that the wakeup is transient. If
it isn't, the only choice is to panic, as the system is likely to be in
a bad state, eg. interrupts weren't routed away. The same applies for
SYSTEM_OFF, SYSTEM_RESET, and SYSTEM_RESET2. There the panic won't
matter as the system is going offline one way or another. The RAS case
will be considered in a separate patch.

Now, the CPU_SUSPEND case is more involved. First, to powerdown it must
wipe its context as it is not written on warm boot. But it cannot be
overwritten in case of a wakeup. To avoid the catch 22, save a copy that
will only be used if powerdown fails. That is about 500 bytes on the
stack so it hopefully doesn't tip anyone over any limits. In future that
can be avoided by having a core manage its own context.

Second, when the core wakes up, it must undo anything it did to prepare
for poweroff, which for the cores we care about, is writing
CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN. The least intrusive for the cpu library
way of doing this is to simply call the power off hook again and have
the hook toggle the bit. If in the future there need to be more complex
sequences, their direction can be advised on the value of this bit.

Third, do the actual "resume". Most of the logic is already there for
the retention suspend, so that only needs a small touch up to apply to
the powerdown case as well. The missing bit is the powerdown specific
state management. Luckily, the warmboot entrypoint does exactly that
already too, so steal that and we're done.

All of this is hidden behind a FEAT_PABANDON flag since it has a large
memory and runtime cost that we don't want to burden non pabandon cores
with.

Finally, do some function renaming to better reflect their purpose and
make names a little bit more consistent.

Change-Id: I2405b59300c2e24ce02e266f91b7c51474c1145f
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes from topic "bk/smccc_feature" into integration

* changes:
feat(smccc): implement SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURE_AVAILABILITY
refactor(cm): clean up per-world context
refactor(cm): change own

Merge changes from topic "bk/smccc_feature" into integration

* changes:
feat(smccc): implement SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURE_AVAILABILITY
refactor(cm): clean up per-world context
refactor(cm): change owning security state when a feature is disabled

show more ...

feat(smccc): implement SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURE_AVAILABILITY

SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURE_AVAILABILITY [1] is a call to query firmware about
the features it is aware of and enables. This is useful when a feature
is

feat(smccc): implement SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURE_AVAILABILITY

SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURE_AVAILABILITY [1] is a call to query firmware about
the features it is aware of and enables. This is useful when a feature
is not enabled at EL3, eg due to an older FW image, but it is present in
hardware. In those cases, the EL1 ID registers do not reflect the usable
feature set and this call should provide the necessary information to
remedy that.

The call itself is very lightweight - effectively a sanitised read of
the relevant system register. Bits that are not relevant to feature
enablement are masked out and active low bits are converted to active
high.

The implementation is also very simple. All relevant, irrelevant, and
inverted bits combined into bitmasks at build time. Then at runtime the
masks are unconditionally applied to produce the right result. This
assumes that context managers will make sure that disabled features
do not have their bits set and the registers are context switched if
any fields in them make enablement ambiguous.

Features that are not yet supported in TF-A have not been added. On
debug builds, calling this function will fail an assert if any bits that
are not expected are set. In combination with CI this should allow for
this feature to to stay up to date as new architectural features are
added.

If a call for MPAM3_EL3 is made when MPAM is not enabled, the call
will return INVALID_PARAM, while if it is FEAT_STATE_CHECK, it will
return zero. This should be fairly consistent with feature detection.

The bitmask is meant to be interpreted as the logical AND of the
relevant ID registers. It would be permissible for this to return 1
while the ID returns 0. Despite this, this implementation takes steps
not to. In the general case, the two should match exactly.

Finally, it is not entirely clear whether this call replies to SMC32
requests. However, it will not, as the return values are all 64 bits.

[1]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/galp1/?lang=en

Co-developed-by: Charlie Bareham <charlie.bareham@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
Change-Id: I1a74e7d0b3459b1396961b8fa27f84e3f0ad6a6f

show more ...

Merge changes from topic "hob_creation_in_tf_a" into integration

* changes:
feat(fvp): build hob library
feat(lib): introduce Hob creation library
feat(lib): modify Hob creation code imported

Merge changes from topic "hob_creation_in_tf_a" into integration

* changes:
feat(fvp): build hob library
feat(lib): introduce Hob creation library
feat(lib): modify Hob creation code imported from edk2
feat(lib): copy StandaloneMm Hob creation library in edk2

show more ...

feat(lib): introduce Hob creation library

According to Platform Initialization (PI) Specification [1] and
discussion on edk2 mailing list [2],
StandaloneMm shouldn't create Hob but it should be pass

feat(lib): introduce Hob creation library

According to Platform Initialization (PI) Specification [1] and
discussion on edk2 mailing list [2],
StandaloneMm shouldn't create Hob but it should be passed from TF-A.
IOW, TF-A should pass boot information via HOB list to initialise
StandaloneMm properly.

And this HOB lists could be delivered via
- SPM_MM: Transfer List according to the firmware handoff spec[3]

- FF-A v1.1 >= : FF-A boot protocol.

This patch introduces a TF-A HOB creation library and
some of definitions which StandaloneMm requires to boot.

Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/PI_Spec_1_6.pdf [1]
Link: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/103675962#114283 [2]
Link: https://github.com/FirmwareHandoff/firmware_handoff [3]
Signed-off-by: Levi Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Change-Id: I5e0838adce487110206998a8b79bc3adca922cec

show more ...

Merge "build(bl31): support separated memory for RW DATA" into integration

build(bl31): support separated memory for RW DATA

Update linker file and init codes to allow using separated
memory region for RW DATA. Init codes will copy the RW DATA
from the image to the linked

build(bl31): support separated memory for RW DATA

Update linker file and init codes to allow using separated
memory region for RW DATA. Init codes will copy the RW DATA
from the image to the linked address.

On some NXP platforms, after the BL31 image has been verified,
the bl31 image space will be locked/protected as RO only, so
need to move the RW DATA and NOBITS out of the bl31 image.

Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Change-Id: I361d9a715890961bf30790a3325f8085a40c0c39

show more ...

Merge "feat(rmmd): el3 token sign during attestation" into integration

feat(rmmd): el3 token sign during attestation

Add required SMCs by RMM to push attestation signing requests to EL3
and get responses. EL3 may then choose to push these requests to a HES
as suitable

feat(rmmd): el3 token sign during attestation

Add required SMCs by RMM to push attestation signing requests to EL3
and get responses. EL3 may then choose to push these requests to a HES
as suitable for a platform. This patch also supports the new
RMM_EL3_FEATURES interface, that RMM can use to query for support for
HES based signing. The new interface exposes a feature register with
different bits defining different discoverable features. This new
interface is available starting the 0.4 version of the RMM-EL3
interface, causing the version to bump up. This patch also adds a
platform port for FVP that implements the platform hooks required to
enable the new SMCs, but it does not push to a HES and instead copies a
zeroed buffer in EL3.

Change-Id: I69c110252835122a9533e71bdcce10b5f2a686b2
Signed-off-by: Raghu Krishnamurthy <raghupathyk@nvidia.com>

show more ...

Merge "feat(rme): change the default max GPT block size to 512MB" into integration

feat(rme): change the default max GPT block size to 512MB

Previously the max GPT block size was set to 2MB as a conservative
default. For workloads making use of SMMU in Normal world, and has
a Stag

feat(rme): change the default max GPT block size to 512MB

Previously the max GPT block size was set to 2MB as a conservative
default. For workloads making use of SMMU in Normal world, and has
a Stage 2 block mapping of large sizes like 512MB or 1GB, then a
max GPT block size of 2MB may result in performance regression.
Hence this patch changes the default max GPT block size from 2MB to 512MB.

Change-Id: If90f12f494ec0f44d3e5974df8d58fcb528cfd34
Signed-off-by: Soby Mathew <soby.mathew@arm.com>

show more ...

Merge changes from topic "mp/simd_ctxt_mgmt" into integration

* changes:
feat(fvp): allow SIMD context to be put in TZC DRAM
docs(simd): introduce CTX_INCLUDE_SVE_REGS build flag
feat(fvp): ad

Merge changes from topic "mp/simd_ctxt_mgmt" into integration

* changes:
feat(fvp): allow SIMD context to be put in TZC DRAM
docs(simd): introduce CTX_INCLUDE_SVE_REGS build flag
feat(fvp): add Cactus partition manifest for EL3 SPMC
chore(simd): remove unused macros and utilities for FP
feat(el3-spmc): support simd context management upon world switch
feat(trusty): switch to simd_ctx_save/restore apis
feat(pncd): switch to simd_ctx_save/restore apis
feat(spm-mm): switch to simd_ctx_save/restore APIs
feat(simd): add rules to rationalize simd ctxt mgmt
feat(simd): introduce simd context helper APIs
feat(simd): add routines to save, restore sve state
feat(simd): add sve state to simd ctxt struct
feat(simd): add data struct for simd ctxt management

show more ...

feat(simd): introduce simd context helper APIs

This patch adds the common API to save and restore FP and SVE. When SVE
is enabled we save and restore SVE which automatically covers FP. If FP
is enab

feat(simd): introduce simd context helper APIs

This patch adds the common API to save and restore FP and SVE. When SVE
is enabled we save and restore SVE which automatically covers FP. If FP
is enabled while SVE is not, then we save and restore FP only.

The patch uses simd_ctx_t to save and restore both FP and SVE which
means developers need not use fp or sve routines directly. Once all the
calls to fpregs_context_* are replaced with simd_ctx_*, we can remove
fp_regs_t data structure and macros (taken care in a following patch).

simd_ctx_t is currently allocated in section of its own. This will go
into BSS section by default but platform will have option of relocating
it to a different section by overriding in plat.ld.S.

Signed-off-by: Madhukar Pappireddy <madhukar.pappireddy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Okash Khawaja <okash@google.com>
Change-Id: I090f8b8fa3862e527b6c40385249adc69256bf24

show more ...