| #
dfdb73f7 |
| 16-Sep-2025 |
Manish V Badarkhe <manish.badarkhe@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "bk/no_blx_setup" into integration
* changes: fix: replace stray BL2_AT_EL3 with RESET_TO_BL2 refactor(aarch64): move BL31 specific setup out of the PSCI entrypoint re
Merge changes from topic "bk/no_blx_setup" into integration
* changes: fix: replace stray BL2_AT_EL3 with RESET_TO_BL2 refactor(aarch64): move BL31 specific setup out of the PSCI entrypoint refactor: unify blx_setup() and blx_main() fix(bl2): unify the BL2 EL3 and RME entrypoints
show more ...
|
| #
63900851 |
| 11-Sep-2025 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
refactor(aarch64): move BL31 specific setup out of the PSCI entrypoint
We've charged the PSCI entrypoint with doing BL31 specific things like setting up the EL3 context and doing feature detection.
refactor(aarch64): move BL31 specific setup out of the PSCI entrypoint
We've charged the PSCI entrypoint with doing BL31 specific things like setting up the EL3 context and doing feature detection. Well, this is irrelevant for sp_min and not really appropriate for PSCI. So move it to the bl31_warmboot() function to reflect this correctly and bring the feature detection a bit earlier, hopefully spotting more errors.
This allows for a pair of minor cleanups - we can pass the core_pos to psci_warmboot_entrypoint() without having to refetch it, and we can put the pauth enablement in cm_manage_extensions_el3() along with all others. The call of that function is kept after the MMU is turned on so that we have nicer (coherent) access to cpu_data.
Change-Id: Id031cfa0e1d8fe98919a14f9db73eb5bc9e00f67 Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
35b2bbf4 |
| 28-Jul-2025 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "bk/pabandon_cleanup" into integration
* changes: feat(cpus): add pabandon support to the Alto cpu feat(psci): optimise clock init on a pabandon feat(psci): check that
Merge changes from topic "bk/pabandon_cleanup" into integration
* changes: feat(cpus): add pabandon support to the Alto cpu feat(psci): optimise clock init on a pabandon feat(psci): check that CPUs handled a pabandon feat(psci): make pabandon support generic refactor(psci): unify coherency exit between AArch64 and AArch32 refactor(psci): absorb psci_power_down_wfi() into common code refactor(platforms): remove usage of psci_power_down_wfi fix(cm): disable SPE/TRBE correctly
show more ...
|
| #
04c39e46 |
| 24-Mar-2025 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
feat(psci): make pabandon support generic
Support for aborted powerdowns does not require much dedicated code. Rather, it is largely a matter of orchestrating things to happen in the right order.
T
feat(psci): make pabandon support generic
Support for aborted powerdowns does not require much dedicated code. Rather, it is largely a matter of orchestrating things to happen in the right order.
The only exception to this are older secure world dispatchers, which assume that a CPU_SUSPEND call will be terminal and therefore can clobber context. This was patched over in common code and hidden behind a flag. This patch moves this to the dispatchers themselves.
Dispatchers that don't register svc_suspend{_finish} are unaffected. Those that do must save the NS context before clobbering it and restoring in only in case of a pabandon. Due to this operation being non-trivial, this patch makes the assumption that these dispatchers will only be present on hardware that does not support pabandon and therefore does not add any contexting for them. In case this assumption ever changes, asserts are added that should alert us of this change.
Change-Id: I94a907515b782b4d2136c0d274246cfe1d567c0e Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
935e0990 |
| 13-Jun-2025 |
Madhukar Pappireddy <madhukar.pappireddy@arm.com> |
Merge "feat(psci): add API to get number of CPUs currently in ON state" into integration
|
| #
a7be2a57 |
| 29-May-2025 |
Manish V Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe@arm.com> |
feat(psci): add API to get number of CPUs currently in ON state
Introduce a new PSCI helper function `psci_num_cpus_running_on_safe()` to return the number of CPUs that are currently in the ON state
feat(psci): add API to get number of CPUs currently in ON state
Introduce a new PSCI helper function `psci_num_cpus_running_on_safe()` to return the number of CPUs that are currently in the ON state. This API locks the PSCI power state data to ensure consistency and is safe to call in concurrent environments.
This utility can assist components that need to reason about system CPU activity or coordinate operations based on active CPUs.
Change-Id: Ie15aa4bd393a5f01e7cd80ae8a9b28707fde7c53 Signed-off-by: Manish V Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
fcb80d7d |
| 11-Feb-2025 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration
* changes: fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_
Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration
* changes: fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi` chore(psci): drop skip_wfi variable feat(arm): convert arm platforms to expect a wakeup fix(cpus): avoid SME related loss of context on powerdown feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown refactor: panic after calling psci_power_down_wfi() refactor(cpus): undo errata mitigations feat(cpus): add sysreg_bit_toggle
show more ...
|
| #
2b5e00d4 |
| 19-Dec-2024 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown
The simplistic view of a core's powerdown sequence is that power is atomically cut upon calling `wfi`. However, it turns out that it has lots to do
feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown
The simplistic view of a core's powerdown sequence is that power is atomically cut upon calling `wfi`. However, it turns out that it has lots to do - it has to talk to the interconnect to exit coherency, clean caches, check for RAS errors, etc. These take significant amounts of time and are certainly not atomic. As such there is a significant window of opportunity for external events to happen. Many of these steps are not destructive to context, so theoretically, the core can just "give up" half way (or roll certain actions back) and carry on running. The point in this sequence after which roll back is not possible is called the point of no return.
One of these actions is the checking for RAS errors. It is possible for one to happen during this lengthy sequence, or at least remain undiscovered until that point. If the core were to continue powerdown when that happens, there would be no (easy) way to inform anyone about it. Rejecting the powerdown and letting software handle the error is the best way to implement this.
Arm cores since at least the a510 have included this exact feature. So far it hasn't been deemed necessary to account for it in firmware due to the low likelihood of this happening. However, events like GIC wakeup requests are much more probable. Older cores will powerdown and immediately power back up when this happens. Travis and Gelas include a feature similar to the RAS case above, called powerdown abandon. The idea is that this will improve the latency to service the interrupt by saving on work which the core and software need to do.
So far firmware has relied on the `wfi` being the point of no return and if it doesn't explicitly detect a pending interrupt quite early on, it will embark onto a sequence that it expects to end with shutdown. To accommodate for it not being a point of no return, we must undo all of the system management we did, just like in the warm boot entrypoint.
To achieve that, the pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi hook must not be terminal. Most recent platforms do some platform management and finish on the standard `wfi`, followed by a panic or an endless loop as this is expected to not return. To make this generic, any platform that wishes to support wakeups must instead let common code call `psci_power_down_wfi()` right after. Besides wakeups, this lets common code handle powerdown errata better as well.
Then, the CPU_OFF case is simple - PSCI does not allow it to return. So the best that can be done is to attempt the `wfi` a few times (the choice of 32 is arbitrary) in the hope that the wakeup is transient. If it isn't, the only choice is to panic, as the system is likely to be in a bad state, eg. interrupts weren't routed away. The same applies for SYSTEM_OFF, SYSTEM_RESET, and SYSTEM_RESET2. There the panic won't matter as the system is going offline one way or another. The RAS case will be considered in a separate patch.
Now, the CPU_SUSPEND case is more involved. First, to powerdown it must wipe its context as it is not written on warm boot. But it cannot be overwritten in case of a wakeup. To avoid the catch 22, save a copy that will only be used if powerdown fails. That is about 500 bytes on the stack so it hopefully doesn't tip anyone over any limits. In future that can be avoided by having a core manage its own context.
Second, when the core wakes up, it must undo anything it did to prepare for poweroff, which for the cores we care about, is writing CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN. The least intrusive for the cpu library way of doing this is to simply call the power off hook again and have the hook toggle the bit. If in the future there need to be more complex sequences, their direction can be advised on the value of this bit.
Third, do the actual "resume". Most of the logic is already there for the retention suspend, so that only needs a small touch up to apply to the powerdown case as well. The missing bit is the powerdown specific state management. Luckily, the warmboot entrypoint does exactly that already too, so steal that and we're done.
All of this is hidden behind a FEAT_PABANDON flag since it has a large memory and runtime cost that we don't want to burden non pabandon cores with.
Finally, do some function renaming to better reflect their purpose and make names a little bit more consistent.
Change-Id: I2405b59300c2e24ce02e266f91b7c51474c1145f Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
f532cd30 |
| 15-Jan-2025 |
Govindraj Raja <govindraj.raja@arm.com> |
Merge changes I137f69be,Ia2e7168f,I0e569d12,I614272ec,Ib68293f2 into integration
* changes: perf(psci): pass my_core_pos around instead of calling it repeatedly refactor(psci): move timestamp co
Merge changes I137f69be,Ia2e7168f,I0e569d12,I614272ec,Ib68293f2 into integration
* changes: perf(psci): pass my_core_pos around instead of calling it repeatedly refactor(psci): move timestamp collection to psci_pwrdown_cpu refactor(psci): factor common code out of the standby finisher refactor(psci): don't use PSCI_INVALID_PWR_LVL to signal OFF state docs(psci): drop outdated cache maintenance comment
show more ...
|
| #
3b802105 |
| 06-Nov-2024 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
perf(psci): pass my_core_pos around instead of calling it repeatedly
On some platforms plat_my_core_pos is a nontrivial function that takes a bit of time and the compiler really doesn't like to inli
perf(psci): pass my_core_pos around instead of calling it repeatedly
On some platforms plat_my_core_pos is a nontrivial function that takes a bit of time and the compiler really doesn't like to inline. In the PSCI library, at least, we have no need to keep repeatedly calling it and we can instead pass it around as an argument. This saves on a lot of redundant calls, speeding the library up a bit.
Change-Id: I137f69bea80d7cac90d7a20ffe98e1ba8d77246f Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
3d630fa2 |
| 06-Feb-2024 |
Manish V Badarkhe <manish.badarkhe@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "jc/psci_spe" into integration
* changes: fix(spe): invoke spe_disable during power domain off/suspend feat(psci): add psci_do_manage_extensions API fix(arm_fpga): hal
Merge changes from topic "jc/psci_spe" into integration
* changes: fix(spe): invoke spe_disable during power domain off/suspend feat(psci): add psci_do_manage_extensions API fix(arm_fpga): halve number of PEs per core
show more ...
|
| #
160e8434 |
| 14-Sep-2023 |
Jayanth Dodderi Chidanand <jayanthdodderi.chidanand@arm.com> |
feat(psci): add psci_do_manage_extensions API
Adding a new API under PSCI library,for managing all the architectural features, required during power off or suspend cases.
Change-Id: I1659560daa43b9
feat(psci): add psci_do_manage_extensions API
Adding a new API under PSCI library,for managing all the architectural features, required during power off or suspend cases.
Change-Id: I1659560daa43b9344dd0cc0d9b311129b4e9a9c7 Signed-off-by: Jayanth Dodderi Chidanand <jayanthdodderi.chidanand@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
92e93253 |
| 28-Mar-2023 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "psci-osi" into integration
* changes: feat(sc7280): add support for PSCI_OS_INIT_MODE feat(fvp): enable support for PSCI OS-initiated mode feat(psci): update PSCI_FEA
Merge changes from topic "psci-osi" into integration
* changes: feat(sc7280): add support for PSCI_OS_INIT_MODE feat(fvp): enable support for PSCI OS-initiated mode feat(psci): update PSCI_FEATURES feat(psci): add support for OS-initiated mode feat(psci): add support for PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE build(psci): add build option for OS-initiated mode docs(psci): add design proposal for OS-initiated mode
show more ...
|
| #
b88a4416 |
| 14-Sep-2022 |
Wing Li <wingers@google.com> |
feat(psci): add support for PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE
This patch adds a PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE handler that validates the request per section 5.20.2 of the PSCI spec (DEN0022D.b), and updates the suspend
feat(psci): add support for PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE
This patch adds a PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE handler that validates the request per section 5.20.2 of the PSCI spec (DEN0022D.b), and updates the suspend mode to the requested mode.
This is conditionally compiled into the build depending on the value of the `PSCI_OS_INIT_MODE` build option.
Change-Id: Iebf65f5f7846aef6b8643ad6082db99b4dcc4bef Signed-off-by: Wing Li <wingers@google.com>
show more ...
|
| #
75eb87f0 |
| 16-Sep-2022 |
Manish V Badarkhe <manish.badarkhe@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "RDN2_WARM_REBOOT_WITH_SGI" into integration
* changes: feat(sgi): enable css implementation of warm reset feat(scmi): send powerdown request to online secondary cpus
Merge changes from topic "RDN2_WARM_REBOOT_WITH_SGI" into integration
* changes: feat(sgi): enable css implementation of warm reset feat(scmi): send powerdown request to online secondary cpus feat(plat/arm/css): add interrupt handler for reboot request refactor(psci): move psci_do_pwrdown_sequence() out of private header feat(plat/arm/css): add per-cpu power down support for warm reset feat(scmi): set warm reboot entry point fix(gicv3): update the affinity mask to 8 bit
show more ...
|
| #
65bbb935 |
| 22-Jul-2022 |
Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com> |
refactor(psci): move psci_do_pwrdown_sequence() out of private header
Move the psci_do_pwrdown_sequence() function declaration from PSCI private header to common header. The psci_do_pwrdown_sequence
refactor(psci): move psci_do_pwrdown_sequence() out of private header
Move the psci_do_pwrdown_sequence() function declaration from PSCI private header to common header. The psci_do_pwrdown_sequence is required to support warm reset, where each CPU need to execute the powerdown sequence.
Change-Id: I298e7a120be814941fa91c0b001002a080e56263 Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
0051ff87 |
| 21-Jul-2022 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge "feat(psci): add a helper function to ensure that non-boot PEs are offline" into integration
|
| #
ce14a12f |
| 02-Mar-2022 |
Lucian Paul-Trifu <lucian.paultrifu@gmail.com> |
feat(psci): add a helper function to ensure that non-boot PEs are offline
Introduce a helper function that ensures that non-boot PEs are offline. This function will be used by DRTM implementation to
feat(psci): add a helper function to ensure that non-boot PEs are offline
Introduce a helper function that ensures that non-boot PEs are offline. This function will be used by DRTM implementation to ensure that system is running with only single PE.
Signed-off-by: Manish V Badarkhe <manish.badarkhe@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Lucian Paul-Trifu <lucian.paultrifu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> Change-Id: I521ebefa49297026b02554629b1710a232148e01
show more ...
|
| #
86f75c24 |
| 03-Sep-2020 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge "psci: utility api to invoke stop for other cores" into integration
|
| #
22744909 |
| 17-Aug-2020 |
Sandeep Tripathy <sandeep.tripathy@broadcom.com> |
psci: utility api to invoke stop for other cores
The API can be used to invoke a 'stop_func' callback for all other cores from any initiating core. Optionally it can also wait for other cores to pow
psci: utility api to invoke stop for other cores
The API can be used to invoke a 'stop_func' callback for all other cores from any initiating core. Optionally it can also wait for other cores to power down. There may be various use of such API by platform. Ex: Platform may use this to power down all other cores from a crashed core.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Tripathy <sandeep.tripathy@broadcom.com> Change-Id: I4f9dc8a38d419f299c021535d5f1bcc6883106f9
show more ...
|
| #
01c44ddd |
| 02-Aug-2019 |
Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com> |
Merge "Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with compiler-builtin __ASSEMBLER__" into integration
|
| #
d5dfdeb6 |
| 09-Jul-2019 |
Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> |
Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with compiler-builtin __ASSEMBLER__
NOTE: __ASSEMBLY__ macro is now deprecated in favor of __ASSEMBLER__.
All common C compilers predefine a macro called __ASSEMBLER__ when pre
Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with compiler-builtin __ASSEMBLER__
NOTE: __ASSEMBLY__ macro is now deprecated in favor of __ASSEMBLER__.
All common C compilers predefine a macro called __ASSEMBLER__ when preprocessing a .S file. There is no reason for TF-A to define it's own __ASSEMBLY__ macro for this purpose instead. To unify code with the export headers (which use __ASSEMBLER__ to avoid one extra dependency), let's deprecate __ASSEMBLY__ and switch the code base over to the predefined standard.
Change-Id: Id7d0ec8cf330195da80499c68562b65cb5ab7417 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
show more ...
|
| #
9a207532 |
| 04-Jan-2019 |
Antonio Niño Díaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com> |
Merge pull request #1726 from antonio-nino-diaz-arm/an/includes
Sanitise includes across codebase
|
| #
09d40e0e |
| 14-Dec-2018 |
Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com> |
Sanitise includes across codebase
Enforce full include path for includes. Deprecate old paths.
The following folders inside include/lib have been left unchanged:
- include/lib/cpus/${ARCH} - inclu
Sanitise includes across codebase
Enforce full include path for includes. Deprecate old paths.
The following folders inside include/lib have been left unchanged:
- include/lib/cpus/${ARCH} - include/lib/el3_runtime/${ARCH}
The reason for this change is that having a global namespace for includes isn't a good idea. It defeats one of the advantages of having folders and it introduces problems that are sometimes subtle (because you may not know the header you are actually including if there are two of them).
For example, this patch had to be created because two headers were called the same way: e0ea0928d5b7 ("Fix gpio includes of mt8173 platform to avoid collision."). More recently, this patch has had similar problems: 46f9b2c3a282 ("drivers: add tzc380 support").
This problem was introduced in commit 4ecca33988b9 ("Move include and source files to logical locations"). At that time, there weren't too many headers so it wasn't a real issue. However, time has shown that this creates problems.
Platforms that want to preserve the way they include headers may add the removed paths to PLAT_INCLUDES, but this is discouraged.
Change-Id: I39dc53ed98f9e297a5966e723d1936d6ccf2fc8f Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
6d4f6aea |
| 22-Aug-2018 |
Dimitris Papastamos <dimitris.papastamos@arm.com> |
Merge pull request #1528 from antonio-nino-diaz-arm/an/libc
libc: Cleanup library
|