xref: /rk3399_ARM-atf/docs/process/contributing.rst (revision ec767c1b99675fbb50ef1b2fdb2d38e881e4789d)
1Contributor's Guide
2===================
3
4Getting Started
5---------------
6
7-  Make sure you have a Github account and you are logged on both
8   `developer.trustedfirmware.org`_ and `review.trustedfirmware.org`_.
9
10-  If you plan to contribute a major piece of work, it is usually a good idea to
11   start a discussion around it on the mailing list. This gives everyone
12   visibility of what is coming up, you might learn that somebody else is
13   already working on something similar or the community might be able to
14   provide some early input to help shaping the design of the feature.
15
16   If you intend to include Third Party IP in your contribution, please mention
17   it explicitly in the email thread and ensure that the changes that include
18   Third Party IP are made in a separate patch (or patch series).
19
20-  Clone `Trusted Firmware-A`_ on your own machine as described in
21   :ref:`prerequisites_get_source`.
22
23-  Create a local topic branch based on the `Trusted Firmware-A`_ ``master``
24   branch.
25
26Making Changes
27--------------
28
29-  Make commits of logical units. See these general `Git guidelines`_ for
30   contributing to a project.
31
32-  Ensure your commit messages comply with the `Conventional Commits`_
33   specification:
34
35   .. code::
36
37       <type>[optional scope]: <description>
38
39       [optional body]
40
41       [optional footer(s)]
42
43   You can use the tooling installed by the optional steps in the
44   :ref:`prerequisites <Prerequisites>` guide to validate this locally.
45
46-  Keep the commits on topic. If you need to fix another bug or make another
47   enhancement, please address it on a separate topic branch.
48
49-  Split the patch in manageable units. Small patches are usually easier to
50   review so this will speed up the review process.
51
52-  Avoid long commit series. If you do have a long series, consider whether
53   some commits should be squashed together or addressed in a separate topic.
54
55-  Ensure that each commit in the series has at least one ``Signed-off-by:``
56   line, using your real name and email address. The names in the
57   ``Signed-off-by:`` and ``Commit:`` lines must match. By adding this line the
58   contributor certifies the contribution is made under the terms of the
59   :download:`Developer Certificate of Origin <../../dco.txt>`.
60
61   There might be multiple ``Signed-off-by:`` lines, depending on the history
62   of the patch.
63
64   More details may be found in the `Gerrit Signed-off-by Lines guidelines`_.
65
66-  Ensure that each commit also has a unique ``Change-Id:`` line. If you have
67   cloned the repository with the "`Clone with commit-msg hook`" clone method
68   (following the :ref:`Prerequisites` document), this should already be the
69   case.
70
71   More details may be found in the `Gerrit Change-Ids documentation`_.
72
73-  Write informative and comprehensive commit messages. A good commit message
74   provides all the background information needed for reviewers to understand
75   the intent and rationale of the patch. This information is also useful for
76   future reference.
77
78   For example:
79
80   -  What does the patch do?
81   -  What motivated it?
82   -  What impact does it have?
83   -  How was it tested?
84   -  Have alternatives been considered? Why did you choose this approach over
85      another one?
86   -  If it fixes an `issue`_, include a reference.
87
88-  Follow the :ref:`Coding Style` and :ref:`Coding Guidelines`.
89
90   -  Use the checkpatch.pl script provided with the Linux source tree. A
91      Makefile target is provided for convenience, see :ref:`this
92      section<automatic-compliance-checking>` for more details.
93
94-  Where appropriate, please update the documentation.
95
96   -  Consider whether the :ref:`Porting Guide`, :ref:`Firmware Design` document
97      or other in-source documentation needs updating.
98
99   -  If you are submitting new files that you intend to be the code owner for
100      (for example, a new platform port), then also update the
101      :ref:`code owners` file.
102
103   -  For topics with multiple commits, you should make all documentation changes
104      (and nothing else) in the last commit of the series. Otherwise, include
105      the documentation changes within the single commit.
106
107.. _copyright-license-guidance:
108
109-  Ensure that each changed file has the correct copyright and license
110   information. Files that entirely consist of contributions to this project
111   should have a copyright notice and BSD-3-Clause SPDX license identifier of
112   the form as shown in :ref:`license`. Files that contain changes to imported
113   Third Party IP files should retain their original copyright and license
114   notices.
115
116   For significant contributions you may add your own copyright notice in the
117   following format:
118
119   ::
120
121       Portions copyright (c) [XXXX-]YYYY, <OWNER>. All rights reserved.
122
123   where XXXX is the year of first contribution (if different to YYYY) and YYYY
124   is the year of most recent contribution. <OWNER> is your name or your company
125   name.
126
127-  Ensure that each patch in the patch series compiles in all supported
128   configurations. Patches which do not compile will not be merged.
129
130-  Please test your changes. As a minimum, ensure that Linux boots on the
131   Foundation FVP. See :ref:`Arm Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVP)` for more
132   information. For more extensive testing, consider running the `TF-A Tests`_
133   against your patches.
134
135-  Ensure that all CI automated tests pass. Failures should be fixed. They might
136   block a patch, depending on how critical they are.
137
138Submitting Changes
139------------------
140
141-  Submit your changes for review at https://review.trustedfirmware.org
142   targeting the ``integration`` branch.
143
144-  Add reviewers for your patch:
145
146   -  At least one code owner for each module modified by the patch. See the list
147      of modules and their :ref:`code owners`.
148
149   -  At least one maintainer. See the list of :ref:`maintainers`.
150
151   -  If some module has no code owner, try to identify a suitable (non-code
152      owner) reviewer. Running ``git blame`` on the module's source code can
153      help, as it shows who has been working the most recently on this area of
154      the code.
155
156      Alternatively, if it is impractical to identify such a reviewer, you might
157      send an email to the `TF-A mailing list`_ to broadcast your review request
158      to the community.
159
160   Note that self-reviewing a patch is prohibited, even if the patch author is
161   the only code owner of a module modified by the patch. Getting a second pair
162   of eyes on the code is essential to keep up with the quality standards the
163   project aspires to.
164
165-  The changes will then undergo further review by the designated people. Any
166   review comments will be made directly on your patch. This may require you to
167   do some rework. For controversial changes, the discussion might be moved to
168   the `TF-A mailing list`_ to involve more of the community.
169
170   Refer to the `Gerrit Uploading Changes documentation`_ for more details.
171
172-  The patch submission rules are the following. For a patch to be approved
173   and merged in the tree, it must get:
174
175   -  One ``Code-Owner-Review+1`` for each of the modules modified by the patch.
176   -  A ``Maintainer-Review+1``.
177
178   In the case where a code owner could not be found for a given module,
179   ``Code-Owner-Review+1`` is substituted by ``Code-Review+1``.
180
181   In addition to these various code review labels, the patch must also get a
182   ``Verified+1``. This is usually set by the Continuous Integration (CI) bot
183   when all automated tests passed on the patch. Sometimes, some of these
184   automated tests may fail for reasons unrelated to the patch. In this case,
185   the maintainers might (after analysis of the failures) override the CI bot
186   score to certify that the patch has been correctly tested.
187
188   In the event where the CI system lacks proper tests for a patch, the patch
189   author or a reviewer might agree to perform additional manual tests
190   in their review and the reviewer incorporates the review of the additional
191   testing in the ``Code-Review+1`` or ``Code-Owner-Review+1`` as applicable to
192   attest that the patch works as expected. Where possible additional tests should
193   be added to the CI system as a follow up task. For example, for a
194   platform-dependent patch where the said platform is not available in the CI
195   system's board farm.
196
197-  When the changes are accepted, the :ref:`maintainers` will integrate them.
198
199   -  Typically, the :ref:`maintainers` will merge the changes into the
200      ``integration`` branch.
201
202   -  If the changes are not based on a sufficiently-recent commit, or if they
203      cannot be automatically rebased, then the :ref:`maintainers` may rebase it
204      on the ``integration`` branch or ask you to do so.
205
206   -  After final integration testing, the changes will make their way into the
207      ``master`` branch. If a problem is found during integration, the
208      :ref:`maintainers` will request your help to solve the issue. They may
209      revert your patches and ask you to resubmit a reworked version of them or
210      they may ask you to provide a fix-up patch.
211
212Binary Components
213-----------------
214
215-  Platforms may depend on binary components submitted to the `Trusted Firmware
216   binary repository`_ if they require code that the contributor is unable or
217   unwilling to open-source. This should be used as a rare exception.
218-  All binary components must follow the contribution guidelines (in particular
219   licensing rules) outlined in the `readme.rst <tf-binaries-readme_>`_ file of
220   the binary repository.
221-  Binary components must be restricted to only the specific functionality that
222   cannot be open-sourced and must be linked into a larger open-source platform
223   port. The majority of the platform port must still be implemented in open
224   source. Platform ports that are merely a thin wrapper around a binary
225   component that contains all the actual code will not be accepted.
226-  Only platform port code (i.e. in the ``plat/<vendor>`` directory) may rely on
227   binary components. Generic code must always be fully open-source.
228
229--------------
230
231*Copyright (c) 2013-2020, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
232
233.. _Conventional Commits: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0
234.. _developer.trustedfirmware.org: https://developer.trustedfirmware.org
235.. _review.trustedfirmware.org: https://review.trustedfirmware.org
236.. _issue: https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/project/board/1/
237.. _Trusted Firmware-A: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git
238.. _Git guidelines: http://git-scm.com/book/ch5-2.html
239.. _Gerrit Uploading Changes documentation: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/Documentation/user-upload.html
240.. _Gerrit Signed-off-by Lines guidelines: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/Documentation/user-signedoffby.html
241.. _Gerrit Change-Ids documentation: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/Documentation/user-changeid.html
242.. _TF-A Tests: https://trustedfirmware-a-tests.readthedocs.io
243.. _Trusted Firmware binary repository: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/admin/repos/tf-binaries
244.. _tf-binaries-readme: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/tf-binaries.git/tree/readme.rst
245.. _TF-A mailing list: https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a
246