1From 95e601ce116dd46ea7915c171976b85ea0905d58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2From: Lonnie Abelbeck <lonnie@abelbeck.com>
3Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 14:05:56 -0500
4Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins
5
6Follow-up to 561dbda, a check of GCC atomic builtins needs to be done
7first.
8
9I'm no autoconf guru, but using this:
10https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/blob/0df485c285b73c34ba9062f0c27e55c3c702930d/configure.ac#L469
11as inspiration, I created a pre-check before calling AC_SEARCH_LIBS(...)
12
13Fixes #1135
14Closes #1139
15Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/kraj/libusb/commit/95e601ce116dd46ea7915c171976b85ea0905d58]
16Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
17---
18 configure.ac          | 16 +++++++++++++++-
19 libusb/version_nano.h |  2 +-
20 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
21
22--- a/configure.ac
23+++ b/configure.ac
24@@ -153,7 +153,21 @@ if test "x$platform" = xposix; then
25 	AC_SEARCH_LIBS([pthread_create], [pthread],
26 		[test "x$ac_cv_search_pthread_create" != "xnone required" && AC_SUBST(THREAD_LIBS, [-lpthread])],
27 		[], [])
28-	AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_fetch_add_4], [atomic])
29+	dnl Check for new-style atomic builtins. We first check without linking to -latomic.
30+	AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether __atomic_load_n is supported)
31+	AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
32+	#include <stdint.h>
33+	int main() {
34+		struct {
35+			uint64_t *v;
36+		} x;
37+		return (int)__atomic_load_n(x.v, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) &
38+		       (int)__atomic_add_fetch(x.v, (uint64_t)1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
39+	}]])], GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED=yes, GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED=no)
40+	AC_MSG_RESULT($GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED)
41+	if test "x$GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED" != xyes; then
42+		AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_fetch_add_4], [atomic])
43+	fi
44 elif test "x$platform" = xwindows; then
45 	AC_DEFINE([PLATFORM_WINDOWS], [1], [Define to 1 if compiling for a Windows platform.])
46 else
47