xref: /OK3568_Linux_fs/buildroot/package/glibc/2.28-69-g1e5c5303a522764d7e9d2302a60e4a32cdb902f1/0005-Disable-spurious-Wstringop-overflow-for-setjmp-longj.patch (revision 4882a59341e53eb6f0b4789bf948001014eff981)

From 12cd30dbe088f20a2953985ca1612cb6a539700d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 21:38:31 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 05/20] Disable spurious -Wstringop-overflow for setjmp/longjmp
 (bug 26647)

Building glibc with GCC 11 fails with (among other warnings) spurious
-Wstringop-overflow warnings from calls to setjmp and longjmp with a
pointer to a pthread_unwind_buf that is smaller than jmp_buf.  As
discussed in bug 26647, the warning in libc-start.c is a false
positive, because setjmp and longjmp do not access anything (the
signal mask) beyond the common prefix of the two structures, so this
patch disables the warning for that call to setjmp, as well as for two
calls in NPTL code that produce the same warning and look like false
positives for the same reason.

Tested with build-many-glibcs.py for arm-linux-gnueabi, where this
allows the build to get further.

Reviewed-by: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2098d4034d398cbde6ccd4a2aaac52c518374698)
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---
 csu/libc-start.c      | 10 ++++++++++
 nptl/pthread_create.c | 10 ++++++++++
 nptl/unwind.c         | 10 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/csu/libc-start.c b/csu/libc-start.c
index 49413236..dd572d53 100644
--- a/csu/libc-start.c
+++ b/csu/libc-start.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <ldsodefs.h>
 #include <exit-thread.h>
+#include <libc-diag.h>
 #include <libc-internal.h>

 #include <elf/dl-tunables.h>
@@ -292,7 +293,16 @@ LIBC_START_MAIN (int (*main) (int, char **, char ** MAIN_AUXVEC_DECL),
   struct pthread_unwind_buf unwind_buf;

   int not_first_call;
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
+  /* This call results in a -Wstringop-overflow warning because struct
+     pthread_unwind_buf is smaller than jmp_buf.  setjmp and longjmp
+     do not use anything beyond the common prefix (they never access
+     the saved signal mask), so that is a false positive.  */
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (11, "-Wstringop-overflow=");
+#endif
   not_first_call = setjmp ((struct __jmp_buf_tag *) unwind_buf.cancel_jmp_buf);
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
   if (__glibc_likely (! not_first_call))
     {
       struct pthread *self = THREAD_SELF;
diff --git a/nptl/pthread_create.c b/nptl/pthread_create.c
index fe75d041..05bbbd88 100644
--- a/nptl/pthread_create.c
+++ b/nptl/pthread_create.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <hp-timing.h>
 #include <ldsodefs.h>
 #include <atomic.h>
+#include <libc-diag.h>
 #include <libc-internal.h>
 #include <resolv.h>
 #include <kernel-features.h>
@@ -429,7 +430,16 @@ START_THREAD_DEFN
   struct pthread_unwind_buf unwind_buf;

   int not_first_call;
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
+  /* This call results in a -Wstringop-overflow warning because struct
+     pthread_unwind_buf is smaller than jmp_buf.  setjmp and longjmp
+     do not use anything beyond the common prefix (they never access
+     the saved signal mask), so that is a false positive.  */
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (11, "-Wstringop-overflow=");
+#endif
   not_first_call = setjmp ((struct __jmp_buf_tag *) unwind_buf.cancel_jmp_buf);
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;

   /* No previous handlers.  NB: This must be done after setjmp since the
      private space in the unwind jump buffer may overlap space used by
diff --git a/nptl/unwind.c b/nptl/unwind.c
index b37a063c..3cf0779d 100644
--- a/nptl/unwind.c
+++ b/nptl/unwind.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <string.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include "pthreadP.h"
+#include <libc-diag.h>
 #include <jmpbuf-unwind.h>

 #ifdef _STACK_GROWS_DOWN
@@ -90,8 +91,17 @@ unwind_stop (int version, _Unwind_Action actions,
 	}
     }

+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
+  /* This call results in a -Wstringop-overflow warning because struct
+     pthread_unwind_buf is smaller than jmp_buf.  setjmp and longjmp
+     do not use anything beyond the common prefix (they never access
+     the saved signal mask), so that is a false positive.  */
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (11, "-Wstringop-overflow=");
+#endif
   if (do_longjump)
     __libc_unwind_longjmp ((struct __jmp_buf_tag *) buf->cancel_jmp_buf, 1);
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;

   return _URC_NO_REASON;
 }
--
2.20.1