Searched refs:yy_act (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
878 int yy_act; variable947 yy_act = yy_accept[yy_current_state];951 if ( yy_act != YY_END_OF_BUFFER && yy_rule_can_match_eol[yy_act] )963 switch ( yy_act )1240 yy_act = YY_STATE_EOF(YY_START);
733 int yy_act; variable801 yy_act = yy_accept[yy_current_state];802 if ( yy_act == 0 )806 yy_act = yy_accept[yy_current_state];813 switch ( yy_act )1017 yy_act = YY_STATE_EOF(YY_START);
1035 register int yy_act;1086 yy_act = yy_accept[yy_current_state];1092 switch ( yy_act )1476 yy_act = YY_STATE_EOF(YY_START);
852 int yy_act;922 yy_act = yy_accept[yy_current_state];928 switch ( yy_act )1345 yy_act = YY_STATE_EOF(YY_START);
164 * access to the local variable yy_act. Since yyless() is a macro, it would break166 * One obvious solution it to make yy_act a global. I tried that, and saw167 * a 5% performance hit in a non-yylineno scanner, because yy_act is1026 int yy_act;1079 yy_act = yy_accept[yy_current_state];1083 if ( yy_act != YY_END_OF_BUFFER && yy_rule_can_match_eol[yy_act] )1095 switch ( yy_act )1479 yy_act = YY_STATE_EOF(YY_START);