Searched hist:b45fc164162d53ee5f658b896951dae75af4ca54 (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/make_helpers/ |
| H A D | cflags.mk | b45fc164162d53ee5f658b896951dae75af4ca54 Tue May 13 09:06:22 UTC 2025 Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> fix(build): correctly detect that an option is missing with ld_option
We support building directly with ld and indirectly with gcc. The
`ld_option` macro is oblivious to this and does a check for both styles
of invocation. However, the gcc one is incorrect - gcc returns `0` even
when it has printed an error saying that it doesn't recognise the
option. Add a discovery function for each linker we expect and
dynamically dispatch to the correct one.
While we're at it, also add a little bit of code to return the -Wl
prefix for gcc and not for ld.
All of the above is also true for clang and lld, although they don't
suffer from the problem that gcc does.
Change-Id: I4f7bdf40c01f4c5df9c177f5048f5e349bc2b9c9
Co-authored-by: Chris Kay <chris.kay@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
|
| H A D | toolchain.mk | b45fc164162d53ee5f658b896951dae75af4ca54 Tue May 13 09:06:22 UTC 2025 Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> fix(build): correctly detect that an option is missing with ld_option
We support building directly with ld and indirectly with gcc. The
`ld_option` macro is oblivious to this and does a check for both styles
of invocation. However, the gcc one is incorrect - gcc returns `0` even
when it has printed an error saying that it doesn't recognise the
option. Add a discovery function for each linker we expect and
dynamically dispatch to the correct one.
While we're at it, also add a little bit of code to return the -Wl
prefix for gcc and not for ld.
All of the above is also true for clang and lld, although they don't
suffer from the problem that gcc does.
Change-Id: I4f7bdf40c01f4c5df9c177f5048f5e349bc2b9c9
Co-authored-by: Chris Kay <chris.kay@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
|
| H A D | build_macros.mk | b45fc164162d53ee5f658b896951dae75af4ca54 Tue May 13 09:06:22 UTC 2025 Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> fix(build): correctly detect that an option is missing with ld_option
We support building directly with ld and indirectly with gcc. The
`ld_option` macro is oblivious to this and does a check for both styles
of invocation. However, the gcc one is incorrect - gcc returns `0` even
when it has printed an error saying that it doesn't recognise the
option. Add a discovery function for each linker we expect and
dynamically dispatch to the correct one.
While we're at it, also add a little bit of code to return the -Wl
prefix for gcc and not for ld.
All of the above is also true for clang and lld, although they don't
suffer from the problem that gcc does.
Change-Id: I4f7bdf40c01f4c5df9c177f5048f5e349bc2b9c9
Co-authored-by: Chris Kay <chris.kay@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
|
| /rk3399_ARM-atf/plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/m0/ |
| H A D | Makefile | b45fc164162d53ee5f658b896951dae75af4ca54 Tue May 13 09:06:22 UTC 2025 Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> fix(build): correctly detect that an option is missing with ld_option
We support building directly with ld and indirectly with gcc. The
`ld_option` macro is oblivious to this and does a check for both styles
of invocation. However, the gcc one is incorrect - gcc returns `0` even
when it has printed an error saying that it doesn't recognise the
option. Add a discovery function for each linker we expect and
dynamically dispatch to the correct one.
While we're at it, also add a little bit of code to return the -Wl
prefix for gcc and not for ld.
All of the above is also true for clang and lld, although they don't
suffer from the problem that gcc does.
Change-Id: I4f7bdf40c01f4c5df9c177f5048f5e349bc2b9c9
Co-authored-by: Chris Kay <chris.kay@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
|