xref: /OK3568_Linux_fs/yocto/poky/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch (revision 4882a59341e53eb6f0b4789bf948001014eff981)
1From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
3Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
4Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
5
6A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
7of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
8that include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this
9vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
10exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
11(DoS) attack on affected systems.
12
13Fixes CVE-2023-0464
14
15Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
16Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
17(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
18
19Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1]
20CVE: CVE-2023-0464
21Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com>
22---
23 crypto/x509/pcy_local.h |  8 +++++++-
24 crypto/x509/pcy_node.c  | 12 +++++++++---
25 crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c  | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
26 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
27
28diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
29index 18b53cc..cba107c 100644
30--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
31+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
32@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
33 };
34
35 struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
36+    /* The number of nodes in the tree */
37+    size_t node_count;
38+    /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
39+    size_t node_maximum;
40+
41     /* This is the tree 'level' data */
42     X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
43     int nlevel;
44@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
45 X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
46                                              X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
47                                              X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
48-                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
49+                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
50+                                             int extra_data);
51 void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
52 int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
53                            const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
54diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
55index 9d9a7ea..450f95a 100644
56--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
57+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
58@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
59 X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
60                                              X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
61                                              X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
62-                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
63+                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
64+                                             int extra_data)
65 {
66     X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
67
68+    /* Verify that the tree isn't too large.  This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
69+    if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
70+        return NULL;
71+
72     node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
73     if (node == NULL) {
74         ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
75@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
76     }
77     node->data = data;
78     node->parent = parent;
79-    if (level) {
80+    if (level != NULL) {
81         if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
82             if (level->anyPolicy)
83                 goto node_error;
84@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
85         }
86     }
87
88-    if (tree) {
89+    if (extra_data) {
90         if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
91             tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
92         if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
93@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
94         }
95     }
96
97+    tree->node_count++;
98     if (parent)
99         parent->nchild++;
100
101diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
102index fa45da5..f953a05 100644
103--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
104+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
105@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
106
107 #include "pcy_local.h"
108
109+/*
110+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
111+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
112+ *
113+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
114+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
115+ */
116+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
117+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
118+#endif
119+
120 static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
121                            X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
122                            int indent)
123@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
124         return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
125     }
126
127+    /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
128+    tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
129+
130     /*
131      * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
132      *
133@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
134     if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
135                                      OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
136         goto bad_tree;
137-    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
138+    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
139         ossl_policy_data_free(data);
140         goto bad_tree;
141     }
142@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
143  * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
144  */
145 static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
146-                                    X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
147+                                    X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
148+                                    X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
149 {
150     X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
151     int i, matched = 0;
152@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
153         X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
154
155         if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
156-            if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
157+            if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
158                 return 0;
159             matched = 1;
160         }
161     }
162     if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
163-        if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
164+        if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
165             return 0;
166     }
167     return 1;
168@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
169  * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
170  */
171 static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
172-                           const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
173+                           const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
174+                           X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
175 {
176     int i;
177
178@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
179         X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
180
181         /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
182-        if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
183+        if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
184             return 0;
185     }
186     return 1;
187@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
188     /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
189     data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
190     data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
191-    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
192+    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
193         ossl_policy_data_free(data);
194         return 0;
195     }
196@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
197     /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
198     if (last->anyPolicy &&
199             ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
200-                                       last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
201+                                       last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
202         return 0;
203     return 1;
204 }
205@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
206             extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
207                 | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
208             node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
209-                                              tree);
210+                                              tree, 1);
211         }
212         if (!tree->user_policies) {
213             tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
214@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
215
216     for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
217         cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
218-        if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
219+        if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
220             return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
221
222         if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
223--
2242.35.7
225
226