| /rk3399_rockchip-uboot/doc/ |
| H A D | README.mpc85xx | c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e Fri Sep 21 00:02:18 UTC 2012 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
| /rk3399_rockchip-uboot/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/ |
| H A D | spl_minimal.c | c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e Fri Sep 21 00:02:18 UTC 2012 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
| H A D | u-boot-spl.lds | c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e Fri Sep 21 00:02:18 UTC 2012 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
| H A D | tlb.c | c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e Fri Sep 21 00:02:18 UTC 2012 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
| H A D | cpu.c | c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e Fri Sep 21 00:02:18 UTC 2012 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
| /rk3399_rockchip-uboot/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ |
| H A D | law.c | c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e Fri Sep 21 00:02:18 UTC 2012 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|