Lines Matching refs:hardcode_direct
1109 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
2175 if test no != "$_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)" &&
4972 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5180 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5338 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5371 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5441 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5450 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5467 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5658 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5665 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5674 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5686 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5703 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5751 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5755 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5822 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5828 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5839 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5966 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5975 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes # is this really true???
5982 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5986 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no #Motorola manual says yes, but my tests say they lie
6167 _LT_TAGDECL([], [hardcode_direct], [0],
6323 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6512 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6521 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6538 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
6796 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6844 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6848 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6907 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7118 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7131 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7685 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7821 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no