| #
ddc1fcee |
| 26-Sep-2025 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge "refactor(arm/common): gate coherency behind flag" into integration
|
| #
36fbcf4d |
| 17-Sep-2025 |
Ahmed Azeem <ahmed.azeem@arm.com> |
refactor(arm/common): gate coherency behind flag
Introduce a macro guard so platform coherency functions are only compiled when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY is 0 (disabled). Many platforms enable HW-assist
refactor(arm/common): gate coherency behind flag
Introduce a macro guard so platform coherency functions are only compiled when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY is 0 (disabled). Many platforms enable HW-assisted coherency by default, so compiling empty definitions is unnecessary.
This refactor removes those empty functions for Arm CSS platforms.
Change-Id: I102ead46960e9da2d8b968f60cbfd3e5e5da1096 Signed-off-by: Ahmed Azeem <ahmed.azeem@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
f8901e38 |
| 23-Jun-2025 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge "feat(dsu): support power control and autonomous powerdown config" into integration
|
| #
d52ff2b3 |
| 07-May-2025 |
Arvind Ram Prakash <arvind.ramprakash@arm.com> |
feat(dsu): support power control and autonomous powerdown config
This patch allows platforms to enable certain DSU settings to ensure memory retention and control over cache power requests. We also
feat(dsu): support power control and autonomous powerdown config
This patch allows platforms to enable certain DSU settings to ensure memory retention and control over cache power requests. We also move the driver out of css into drivers/arm. Platforms can configure the CLUSTERPWRCTLR and CLUSTERPWRDN registers [1] to improve power efficiency.
These registers enable finer-grained control of DSU power state transitions, including powerdown and retention.
IMP_CLUSTERPWRCTLR_EL1 provides: - Functional retention: Allows configuration of the duration of inactivity before the DSU uses CLUSTERPACTIVE to request functional retention.
- Cache power request: These bits are output on CLUSTERPACTIVE[19:16] to indicate to the power controller which cache portions must remain powered.
IMP_CLUSTERPWRDN_EL1 includes: - Powerdown: Triggers full cluster powerdown, including control logic.
- Memory retention: Requests memory retention mode, keeping L3 RAM contents while powering off the rest of the DSU.
The DSU-120 TRM [2] provides the full field definitions, which are used as references in the `dsu_driver_data` structure.
References: [1]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100453/latest/ [2]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102547/0201/?lang=en
Signed-off-by: Arvind Ram Prakash <arvind.ramprakash@arm.com> Change-Id: I2eba808b8f2a27797782a333c65dd092b03208fe
show more ...
|
| #
139a5d05 |
| 18-Apr-2025 |
Madhukar Pappireddy <madhukar.pappireddy@arm.com> |
Merge changes I86959e67,I0b0d1d36,I5b5267f4,I056c8710,I3474aa97 into integration
* changes: chore: fix preprocessor checks refactor: convert arm platforms to use the generic GIC driver refacto
Merge changes I86959e67,I0b0d1d36,I5b5267f4,I056c8710,I3474aa97 into integration
* changes: chore: fix preprocessor checks refactor: convert arm platforms to use the generic GIC driver refactor(gic): promote most of the GIC driver to common code refactor: make arm_gicv2.c and arm_gicv3.c common refactor(fvp): use more arm generic code for gicv3
show more ...
|
| #
c5c54e20 |
| 07-Jan-2025 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
refactor: convert arm platforms to use the generic GIC driver
This reduces the code the platforms have to carry and makes their build rules a bit simpler.
The main benefit is that plat_my_core_pos(
refactor: convert arm platforms to use the generic GIC driver
This reduces the code the platforms have to carry and makes their build rules a bit simpler.
The main benefit is that plat_my_core_pos() no longer needs to be called within the driver, helping with performance a bit.
Change-Id: I0b0d1d36d20d67c41c8c9dc14ade11bda6d4a6af Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
fcb80d7d |
| 11-Feb-2025 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration
* changes: fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_
Merge changes I765a7fa0,Ic33f0b6d,I8d1a88c7,I381f96be,I698fa849, ... into integration
* changes: fix(cpus): clear CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN_BIT on reset chore(docs): drop the "wfi" from `pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi` chore(psci): drop skip_wfi variable feat(arm): convert arm platforms to expect a wakeup fix(cpus): avoid SME related loss of context on powerdown feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown refactor: panic after calling psci_power_down_wfi() refactor(cpus): undo errata mitigations feat(cpus): add sysreg_bit_toggle
show more ...
|
| #
da305ec7 |
| 26-Sep-2024 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
feat(arm): convert arm platforms to expect a wakeup
Newer cores in upcoming platforms may refuse to power down. The PSCI library is already prepared for this so convert platform code to also allow t
feat(arm): convert arm platforms to expect a wakeup
Newer cores in upcoming platforms may refuse to power down. The PSCI library is already prepared for this so convert platform code to also allow this. This is simple - drop the `wfi` + panic and let common code deal with the fallout. The end result will be the same (sans the message) except the platform will have fewer responsibilities. The only exception is for cores being signalled to power off gracefully ahead of system reset. That path must also be terminal so replace the end with the same psci_pwrdown_cpu_end() to behave the same as the generic implementation. It will handle wakeups and panic, hoping that the system gets reset from under it. The dmb is upgraded to a dsb so no functional change.
Change-Id: I381f96bec8532bda6ccdac65de57971aac42e7e8 Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
2b5e00d4 |
| 19-Dec-2024 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown
The simplistic view of a core's powerdown sequence is that power is atomically cut upon calling `wfi`. However, it turns out that it has lots to do
feat(psci): allow cores to wake up from powerdown
The simplistic view of a core's powerdown sequence is that power is atomically cut upon calling `wfi`. However, it turns out that it has lots to do - it has to talk to the interconnect to exit coherency, clean caches, check for RAS errors, etc. These take significant amounts of time and are certainly not atomic. As such there is a significant window of opportunity for external events to happen. Many of these steps are not destructive to context, so theoretically, the core can just "give up" half way (or roll certain actions back) and carry on running. The point in this sequence after which roll back is not possible is called the point of no return.
One of these actions is the checking for RAS errors. It is possible for one to happen during this lengthy sequence, or at least remain undiscovered until that point. If the core were to continue powerdown when that happens, there would be no (easy) way to inform anyone about it. Rejecting the powerdown and letting software handle the error is the best way to implement this.
Arm cores since at least the a510 have included this exact feature. So far it hasn't been deemed necessary to account for it in firmware due to the low likelihood of this happening. However, events like GIC wakeup requests are much more probable. Older cores will powerdown and immediately power back up when this happens. Travis and Gelas include a feature similar to the RAS case above, called powerdown abandon. The idea is that this will improve the latency to service the interrupt by saving on work which the core and software need to do.
So far firmware has relied on the `wfi` being the point of no return and if it doesn't explicitly detect a pending interrupt quite early on, it will embark onto a sequence that it expects to end with shutdown. To accommodate for it not being a point of no return, we must undo all of the system management we did, just like in the warm boot entrypoint.
To achieve that, the pwr_domain_pwr_down_wfi hook must not be terminal. Most recent platforms do some platform management and finish on the standard `wfi`, followed by a panic or an endless loop as this is expected to not return. To make this generic, any platform that wishes to support wakeups must instead let common code call `psci_power_down_wfi()` right after. Besides wakeups, this lets common code handle powerdown errata better as well.
Then, the CPU_OFF case is simple - PSCI does not allow it to return. So the best that can be done is to attempt the `wfi` a few times (the choice of 32 is arbitrary) in the hope that the wakeup is transient. If it isn't, the only choice is to panic, as the system is likely to be in a bad state, eg. interrupts weren't routed away. The same applies for SYSTEM_OFF, SYSTEM_RESET, and SYSTEM_RESET2. There the panic won't matter as the system is going offline one way or another. The RAS case will be considered in a separate patch.
Now, the CPU_SUSPEND case is more involved. First, to powerdown it must wipe its context as it is not written on warm boot. But it cannot be overwritten in case of a wakeup. To avoid the catch 22, save a copy that will only be used if powerdown fails. That is about 500 bytes on the stack so it hopefully doesn't tip anyone over any limits. In future that can be avoided by having a core manage its own context.
Second, when the core wakes up, it must undo anything it did to prepare for poweroff, which for the cores we care about, is writing CPUPWRCTLR_EL1.CORE_PWRDN_EN. The least intrusive for the cpu library way of doing this is to simply call the power off hook again and have the hook toggle the bit. If in the future there need to be more complex sequences, their direction can be advised on the value of this bit.
Third, do the actual "resume". Most of the logic is already there for the retention suspend, so that only needs a small touch up to apply to the powerdown case as well. The missing bit is the powerdown specific state management. Luckily, the warmboot entrypoint does exactly that already too, so steal that and we're done.
All of this is hidden behind a FEAT_PABANDON flag since it has a large memory and runtime cost that we don't want to burden non pabandon cores with.
Finally, do some function renaming to better reflect their purpose and make names a little bit more consistent.
Change-Id: I2405b59300c2e24ce02e266f91b7c51474c1145f Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
e6002a2f |
| 19-Dec-2024 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge "fix(css): turn the redistributor off on PSCI CPU_OFF" into integration
|
| #
50009f61 |
| 11-Dec-2024 |
Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> |
fix(css): turn the redistributor off on PSCI CPU_OFF
When GICR_WAKER.ProcessorSleep == 1 (i.e. after gicv3_cpuif_disable()) the GIC will assert the WakeRequest signal to try and wake the core up ins
fix(css): turn the redistributor off on PSCI CPU_OFF
When GICR_WAKER.ProcessorSleep == 1 (i.e. after gicv3_cpuif_disable()) the GIC will assert the WakeRequest signal to try and wake the core up instead of delivering an interrupt. This is useful when a core is in some kind of suspend state.
However, when the core is properly off (CPU_OFF), it shouldn't get woken up in any way other than a CPU_ON call. In the general case interrupts would be routed away so this doesn't matter. But in case they aren't, we want the core to stay off.
So turn the redistributor off on CPU_OFF calls. This will prevent the WakeRequest from being sent.
Change-Id: I7f20591d1c83a4a9639281ef86caa79d6669b536 Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
b38b37ba |
| 10-May-2024 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "ar/pmuSaveRestore" into integration
* changes: feat(tc): add save/restore DSU PMU register support feat(dsu): save/restore DSU PMU register feat(plat): add platform A
Merge changes from topic "ar/pmuSaveRestore" into integration
* changes: feat(tc): add save/restore DSU PMU register support feat(dsu): save/restore DSU PMU register feat(plat): add platform API that gets cluster ID
show more ...
|
| #
b87d7ab1 |
| 07-May-2024 |
Arvind Ram Prakash <arvind.ramprakash@arm.com> |
feat(tc): add save/restore DSU PMU register support
This patch adds support for preserving DSU PMU registers over a power cycle in TC platform.
These PMU registers need to be manually saved/restore
feat(tc): add save/restore DSU PMU register support
This patch adds support for preserving DSU PMU registers over a power cycle in TC platform.
These PMU registers need to be manually saved/restored because they are part of cluster power domain and OS doesn't know when DSU is powered OFF.
Change-Id: Ife9573f205d99d092039cb95674e7434bb5f9239 Signed-off-by: Arvind Ram Prakash <arvind.ramprakash@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
4bb6bd1e |
| 14-Sep-2023 |
Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com> |
Merge "fix(plat/arm): do not program DSU CLUSTERPWRDN register" into integration
|
| #
3209b35d |
| 13-Sep-2023 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
fix(plat/arm): do not program DSU CLUSTERPWRDN register
This reverts commit 9cf7f355ce8984a4cde970d5f57c913d5247ca6d.
Above mentioned commit was writing to cluster power required bit of CLUSTERPWRD
fix(plat/arm): do not program DSU CLUSTERPWRDN register
This reverts commit 9cf7f355ce8984a4cde970d5f57c913d5247ca6d.
Above mentioned commit was writing to cluster power required bit of CLUSTERPWRDN register, which provides an advisory status to the power controller. Bit definition indication: 0 : Cluster power is not required when all cores are powered down 1 : Cluster power is required even when all cores are powered down RESET value of this bit is 0
The current implementation in TF-A just programs this bit to 0 when cluster power down is done but it never sets it to 1. Which actully does not change any behaviour as the value of this bit always remains 0.
Ideally this bit has to be set to 1 when a core powers up (as RESET value is 0) and set it to 0 for any core power down except if its last man standing, in that case we need to ensure the target power level from OS is cluster then we can do set it to 0. There also are some investigation needs to be done to find that whether we need a explicit message to power controller for turning cluster OFF or it will happen automatically.
Considering this needs a bit of analysis as well as a platform to test it on, revert the changes which impact the programming during cluster power down and just keep register defnition.
Change-Id: I4c4ebedae7ca9cd081fb1e0605b9d906d77614d9 Signed-off-by: Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
96df1f1d |
| 18-Jan-2023 |
Madhukar Pappireddy <madhukar.pappireddy@arm.com> |
Merge "fix(plat/css): fix invalid redistributor poweroff" into integration
|
| #
60719e4e |
| 16-Jan-2023 |
Waleed Elmelegy <waleed.elmelegy@arm.com> |
fix(plat/css): fix invalid redistributor poweroff
Commit 4d8c18196378824e388cf31ef991ba8fbbb09cbf introduced an invalid redistributor power off where we turn off the redistributor without checking i
fix(plat/css): fix invalid redistributor poweroff
Commit 4d8c18196378824e388cf31ef991ba8fbbb09cbf introduced an invalid redistributor power off where we turn off the redistributor without checking if the system power domain level is turning off, otherwise we can turn off a redistributor when other cores or clusters are sharing it, also if it does indeed needs powering off during suspend we do it twice. This change fixes this by checking on the system power state first then turning off the redistributor.
Signed-off-by: Waleed Elmelegy <waleed.elmelegy@arm.com> Change-Id: Id202bc2316ab7c516298fa33ea089ae2e221a933
show more ...
|
| #
75eb87f0 |
| 16-Sep-2022 |
Manish V Badarkhe <manish.badarkhe@arm.com> |
Merge changes from topic "RDN2_WARM_REBOOT_WITH_SGI" into integration
* changes: feat(sgi): enable css implementation of warm reset feat(scmi): send powerdown request to online secondary cpus
Merge changes from topic "RDN2_WARM_REBOOT_WITH_SGI" into integration
* changes: feat(sgi): enable css implementation of warm reset feat(scmi): send powerdown request to online secondary cpus feat(plat/arm/css): add interrupt handler for reboot request refactor(psci): move psci_do_pwrdown_sequence() out of private header feat(plat/arm/css): add per-cpu power down support for warm reset feat(scmi): set warm reboot entry point fix(gicv3): update the affinity mask to 8 bit
show more ...
|
| #
f1fe1440 |
| 27-Jul-2022 |
Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com> |
feat(plat/arm/css): add interrupt handler for reboot request
Add platform specific interrupt handler for handling the reboot of all CPU's. On shutdown/reboot, only one CPU invoke PSCI and enter into
feat(plat/arm/css): add interrupt handler for reboot request
Add platform specific interrupt handler for handling the reboot of all CPU's. On shutdown/reboot, only one CPU invoke PSCI and enter into trusted firmware. The CPU which entered trusted firmware signals the rest of the cores which are online using SGI to initiate power down sequence. On receiving the SGI, the handler will power down the GIC redistributor interface of the respective core, configure the power control register and power down the CPU by executing wfi.
In addition to these changes, fix coding style issues that are not directly related to the code being introduced in this patch.
Change-Id: I4917dfdc47be5ce7367bee629486a6344cdd706f Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
158ed580 |
| 27-Jul-2022 |
Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com> |
feat(plat/arm/css): add per-cpu power down support for warm reset
Add a new function to setup a SGI interrupt that will be used to trigger a request for per-cpu power down when executing the PSCI SY
feat(plat/arm/css): add per-cpu power down support for warm reset
Add a new function to setup a SGI interrupt that will be used to trigger a request for per-cpu power down when executing the PSCI SYSTEM_RESET request. This will be used on CSS platform that require all the CPUs to execute the CPU specific power down sequence to complete a warm reboot sequence in which only the CPUs are power cycled.
Change-Id: I80da0f6c3cd0c5c442c82239ba1e1f773821a7f5 Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
009553fc |
| 25-Jan-2021 |
Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> |
Merge "plat/arm: css: Turn ON/OFF redistributor in sync with GIC CPU interface ON/OFF" into integration
|
| #
4d8c1819 |
| 05-Jan-2021 |
Jagadeesh Ujja <jagadeesh.ujja@arm.com> |
plat/arm: css: Turn ON/OFF redistributor in sync with GIC CPU interface ON/OFF
Turn ON/OFF GIC redistributor in sync with GIC CPU interface ON/OFF.
Issue : The Linux prompt hangs when all the cores
plat/arm: css: Turn ON/OFF redistributor in sync with GIC CPU interface ON/OFF
Turn ON/OFF GIC redistributor in sync with GIC CPU interface ON/OFF.
Issue : The Linux prompt hangs when all the cores in a cluster are turned OFF and we try to turn ON a core in that cluster. Previously when TF-A turns ON a core, TF-A first turns ON the redistributor followed by the core. This did not match the flow when turning OFF a core, as TF-A did not turn OFF redistributor when the corresponding core[s] are disabled. This hang is resolved by disabling redistributor as cores are disabled, keeping them in sync.
Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Ujja <jagadeesh.ujja@arm.com> Change-Id: Ifd04fdcfd47b45e00f874f15b098471883d023f0
show more ...
|
| #
1f915222 |
| 24-Apr-2020 |
Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com> |
Merge "Provide a hint to power controller for DSU cluster power down" into integration
|
| #
9cf7f355 |
| 30-Oct-2019 |
Madhukar Pappireddy <madhukar.pappireddy@arm.com> |
Provide a hint to power controller for DSU cluster power down
By writing 0 to CLUSTERPWRDN DSU register bit 0, we send an advisory to the power controller that cluster power is not required when all
Provide a hint to power controller for DSU cluster power down
By writing 0 to CLUSTERPWRDN DSU register bit 0, we send an advisory to the power controller that cluster power is not required when all cores are powered down.
The AArch32 CLUSTERPWRDN register is architecturally mapped to the AArch64 CLUSTERPWRDN_EL1 register
Change-Id: Ie6e67c1c7d811fa25c51e2e405ca7f59bd20c81b Signed-off-by: Madhukar Pappireddy <madhukar.pappireddy@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
235c8174 |
| 04-Feb-2020 |
Mark Dykes <mardyk01@review.trustedfirmware.org> |
Merge "Coverity: remove unnecessary header file includes" into integration
|